
Competition Analysis for Southern Utah Summer 2025: Choose a Report to View Below
Controls for this report
Official standings exactly as the WCA recorded them.
Results — Skewb, Final
9 competitors
| # | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2.41 | 2.65 | 2.65 | DNF | 2.52 | 2.41 | 2.79 | |
| 2 | 2.98 | 4.06 | 3.46 | 4.95 | 4.09 | 2.98 | 4.64 | |
| 3 | 3.87 | 7.44 | 8.02 | 9.21 | 7.86 | 6.43 | 3.87 | |
| 4 | 4.33 | 7.67 | 12.18 | 7.28 | 8.22 | 7.51 | 4.33 | |
| 5 | 5.14 | 8.34 | 7.56 | 12.88 | 7.74 | 9.72 | 5.14 | |
| 6 | 4.20 | 8.35 | 5.07 | 4.20 | 11.16 | DNF | 8.83 | |
| 7 | 5.25 | 9.96 | 11.73 | 10.10 | 11.95 | 8.04 | 5.25 | |
| 8 | 4.80 | 11.44 | 13.04 | 12.80 | 9.04 | 12.48 | 4.80 | |
| 9 | 8.16 | — | 8.16 | DNS | DNS | DNS | DNS |
Placement, best single and official average with every attempt in order. Best and worst counting solves are marked. DNF and DNS are never treated as times.