Competition Analysis for Eretum 3.5: Easy Peasy Edition 2023: Choose a Report to View Below

#	Competitor	Best	Average	1	2	3	4	5
1	Flavio Rimi	55.80	58.31	1:01.54	1:03.14	55.80	57.49	55.89
2	Tea Raimondi Vallesi	50.04	58.84	55.82	1:03.42	1:00.63	50.04	1:00.08
3	Maksymilian Gala	55.84	1:02.76	1:10.77	55.84	1:02.50	1:01.31	1:04.48
4	Marco Rota	58.98	1:05.72	1:04.52	1:15.23	58.98	1:11.31	1:01.33
5	Manfredi Italiano	59.17	1:06.49	1:07.46	1:11.89	1:15.94	1:00.12	59.17
6	Sofia Saletnich	1:08.36	1:12.43	1:08.36	1:13.63	1:28.04	1:12.59	1:11.07
7	Elvin Xu	1:01.07	1:14.62	1:09.70	1:01.07	1:23.78	1:10.38	1:28.05
8	Elisa Gasperotti	1:26.58	1:30.47	DNF	1:33.56	1:26.58	1:27.79	1:30.05
9	Gabriele Cappelletti	1:25.90	1:33.95	1:25.90	1:40.32	1:35.82	1:34.58	1:31.45
10	Alessia Novizio	1:29.29	1:34.94	1:30.69	1:40.11	1:49.30	1:34.01	1:29.29
11	Ismaele Chiarella	1:22.95	1:35.42	1:22.95	1:24.90	1:39.91	DNF	1:41.45
12	Edoardo Brown	1:28.77	1:39.19	1:38.11	1:48.24	1:28.77	1:34.56	1:44.89
13	Mongol Forti	1:53.24	—	1:53.24	2:21.86	—	—	—
14	Simone Cantarelli	2:11.18	—	2:42.08	2:11.18	—	—	—
15	Francesco Catalano	2:12.38	—	2:14.88	2:12.38	—	—	—
16	Chiara Marcucci	2:14.60	—	2:14.60	2:29.33	—	—	—
17	Andrea Marconato	2:21.92	—	2:21.92	2:47.40	—	—	—
18	Nathan Pintus	2:22.72	—	2:22.72	2:49.26	—	—	—
19	Lorenzo D'Ammassa	2:24.13	—	2:24.13	2:27.56	—	—	—
20	Vadim Svezhentsev	2:28.61	—	DNF	2:28.61	—	—	—
21	Andrea Fabi	2:47.33	—	2:47.33	DNF	—	—	—
22	Oscar Luigi M. Gravador	2:54.51	—	DNF	2:54.51	—	—	—
23	Andrea Venuti	DNF	—	DNF	DNF	—	—	—
24	Giosuele Chiarella#23	DNF	—	DNF	DNF	—	—	—
25	Gianluca Placenti#23	DNF	—	DNF	DNF	—	—	—
26	Flavio Cosimi#23	DNF	—	DNF	DNF	—	—	—
27	Valerio Maggi#23	DNF	—	DNF	DNF	—	—	—
28	Edoardo Giordano#23	DNF	—	DNF	DNF	—	—	—
29	Francesco Palma#23	DNF	—	DNF	DNF	—	—	—
30	Antonio Cedrone#23	DNF	—	DNF	DNF	—	—	—

Placement, best single and official average with every attempt in order. Best and worst counting solves are marked. DNF and DNS are never treated as times.