Competition Analysis for Eretum 3.5: Easy Peasy Edition 2023: Choose a Report to View Below

#	Competitor	Best	Average	1	2	3	4	5
1	Valerio Locatelli	5.35	6.83	7.65	7.25	5.35	7.01	6.24
2	Flavio Rimi	7.23	8.78	9.97	8.89	7.23	7.49	10.22
3	Manfredi Italiano	8.06	9.25	9.70	8.90	12.58	9.14	8.06
4	Andrea Marconato	8.72	9.49	8.80	10.56	10.31	9.35	8.72
5	Sofia Saletnich	7.61	9.74	7.61	11.24	14.08	9.63	8.35
6	Nicolo David Lodato	8.71	10.33	8.71	10.39	11.85	11.11	9.50
7	Simone Cantarelli	9.16	10.85	10.14	11.31	11.24	9.16	11.17
8	Elvin Xu	9.83	11.07	9.83	12.84	10.32	12.02	10.87
9	Edoardo Annesi	10.38	11.10	10.78	10.38	10.51	12.00	30.04
10	Matteo Provasi	10.22	11.13	10.93	11.78	11.97	10.68	10.22
11	Edoardo Brown	10.53	11.52	12.57	11.65	11.88	11.04	10.53
12	Marco Rota	11.50	11.75	12.29	11.78	11.61	11.86	11.50
13	Andrea Troiano	9.43	11.91	15.90	10.21	12.95	9.43	12.57
14	Gabriele Cappelletti	10.76	12.02	10.76	18.49	12.41	12.08	11.57
15	Vincenzo Coppola	9.50	12.05	12.98	11.78	9.50	11.38	13.21
16	Tea Raimondi Vallesi	11.23	12.10	12.65	12.46	11.32	12.53	11.23
17	Lorenzo D'Ammassa	9.12	12.72	14.68	10.80	13.46	13.90	9.12
18	Alessandro Mercuri	11.05	12.97	14.92	12.44	11.05	14.17	12.31
19	Valerio Maggi	12.01	13.67	12.01	12.58	15.26	13.16	17.86
20	Vadim Svezhentsev	10.74	13.68	16.17	14.28	12.37	14.40	10.74
21	Maksymilian Gala	12.38	14.77	15.92	12.38	18.01	14.36	14.02
22	Oscar Luigi M. Gravador	14.91	15.78	18.14	14.91	16.77	15.27	15.29
23	Francesco Palma	15.81	16.41	16.48	15.83	16.93	15.81	16.97
24	Giosuele Chiarella	14.86	16.68	14.86	14.94	16.20	18.90	23.64

Placement, best single and official average with every attempt in order. Best and worst counting solves are marked. DNF and DNS are never treated as times.