Competition Analysis for Cubing Portal Trondheim 2023: Choose a Report to View Below

#	Competitor	Best	Average	1	2	3	4	5
1	Herman Westerlund Kalland	1.59	1.99	1.59	3.68	1.61	2.32	2.05
2	Filip Nilsen	1.67	2.32	1.67	2.45	3.59	2.28	2.23
3	Julian Giæver-Engesmo	1.66	3.38	1.66	3.70	3.93	2.51	4.36
4	Jonatan Solheim	2.59	3.41	3.15	3.40	3.68	6.79	2.59
5	Lars Johan Folde	2.12	3.78	2.12	4.76	3.57	4.24	3.52
6	Knut Skaug Haraldsen	3.08	4.23	7.12	3.20	4.45	5.03	3.08
7	John Aslak Wee Kleven	4.29	5.05	6.08	4.30	4.77	4.29	6.65
8	Vegard Hovdenakk Nilsen	4.78	5.07	4.78	5.16	4.87	7.15	5.19
9	Birger Trætli Storvik	4.17	5.15	4.35	5.26	5.84	8.76	4.17
10	Jacob Oliver Bruun	3.35	5.20	3.35	6.00	4.38	DNF	5.23
11	Ole Nikolai Gjerset	3.97	5.20	5.66	7.01	4.97	3.97	4.96
12	Sakeus Løvås	2.47	5.28	DNF	8.17	2.47	3.49	4.18
13	Henrik Tvervåg	2.73	5.32	2.73	7.97	2.82	5.18	DNF
14	Leander Tiller	3.98	5.47	3.98	6.82	4.15	9.33	5.43
15	Oliver Mæle Keiseraas	5.22	5.51	5.22	5.30	5.38	7.46	5.84
16	Andreas Nessan	5.07	5.61	5.21	5.07	5.81	5.82	6.27
17	Thang Vinh Vu	4.15	5.88	DNF	5.98	4.61	7.05	4.15
18	Einar Martin Sandvik	5.22	6.22	6.50	5.81	5.22	6.48	6.38
19	Hyunwoo Kim	6.04	6.95	7.87	6.07	6.04	8.50	6.91
20	Elvine Syvertsen-Wiig	4.26	7.33	6.25	7.04	4.26	8.74	8.69
21	Constantin Geiß	5.61	9.41	12.75	7.41	5.61	8.08	28.23
22	Guttorm Syvertsen-Wiig	6.19	9.52	13.92	6.56	DNF	8.08	6.19
23	Magnus Melkvik Gustavsen	6.24	9.84	10.82	9.28	6.24	12.76	9.43

Placement, best single and official average with every attempt in order. Best and worst counting solves are marked. DNF and DNS are never treated as times.