Competition Analysis for Cles: Too Hot For Cubing 2023: Choose a Report to View Below

#	Competitor	Best	Average	1	2	3	4	5
1	Marco Giordano	1.55	2.07	2.45	1.91	1.85	1.55	2.47
2	Fabian Tomasović	2.31	2.74	2.31	2.58	4.54	2.44	3.19
3	Daniel Sartori	2.78	3.12	3.19	2.96	3.20	2.78	4.00
4	Flavio Rimi	2.88	3.51	4.05	2.88	3.44	3.03	5.77
5	Giacomo Daniele Corò	2.95	3.51	3.52	3.09	5.01	2.95	3.92
6	Alessandro Fava	2.50	3.52	3.05	4.07	2.50	3.44	4.14
7	Alessandro Ricci	2.95	3.53	5.73	2.95	4.38	3.16	3.06
8	Matteo Maggiali	1.83	3.55	3.58	4.70	5.13	1.83	2.36
9	Valerio Locatelli	2.96	3.72	3.53	2.96	3.36	4.90	4.28
10	Damiano Albini	2.90	3.80	5.02	2.90	3.91	3.66	3.83
11	Marco Rota	3.04	3.83	4.15	3.49	3.04	3.84	5.64
12	Nicola Zancanella	3.33	3.86	5.19	4.40	3.33	3.39	3.79
13	Luca Brasini	2.97	4.02	3.76	6.51	3.10	5.20	2.97
14	Alessandro Breda	3.89	4.20	3.92	4.51	4.18	3.89	4.66
15	Mattia Rigo	3.78	4.25	10.99	4.92	3.78	3.79	4.03
16	Evan Maccagnan	2.68	4.50	6.24	6.42	3.48	2.68	3.77
17	Giovanni Montagna Coronado	3.70	4.61	5.28	3.70	3.80	5.76	4.76
18	Alessio Pandin	2.54	4.64	4.77	6.92	4.54	2.54	4.60
19	Paolo Marino	3.60	5.07	4.66	7.63	4.55	3.60	6.00
20	Enea Fiammenghi	4.11	6.25	6.14	4.11	9.87	8.20	4.41

Placement, best single and official average with every attempt in order. Best and worst counting solves are marked. DNF and DNS are never treated as times.