Competition Analysis for Cles: Too Hot For Cubing 2023: Choose a Report to View Below

#	Competitor	Best	Average	1	2	3	4	5
1	Valerio Locatelli	5.33	6.70	6.19	6.87	7.53	7.05	5.33
2	Daniel Sartori	6.67	7.04	7.17	7.44	6.67	6.86	7.08
3	Giacomo Daniele Corò	5.80	8.14	8.89	9.90	5.80	8.28	7.26
4	Alessandro Ricci	7.69	8.14	7.69	8.85	7.85	8.67	7.89
5	Flavio Rimi	7.06	8.63	7.06	7.78	9.16	12.05	8.94
6	Paolo Marino	7.63	8.65	10.16	7.63	10.29	8.09	7.71
7	Alessandro Fava	8.00	9.15	11.58	9.49	8.19	8.00	9.76
8	Damiano Albini	7.53	9.35	8.81	10.75	9.82	9.43	7.53
9	Luca Brasini	8.69	9.47	9.41	10.77	8.91	8.69	10.08
10	Alessandro Calzoni	7.74	9.53	10.48	10.79	7.74	9.58	8.54
11	Fabian Tomasović	8.09	9.68	8.09	9.42	10.06	11.95	9.55
12	Enrico Tenuti	9.62	10.04	9.95	17.13	10.40	9.62	9.78
13	Evan Maccagnan	8.82	11.04	12.84	10.90	11.59	8.82	10.64
14	Gabriele Cappelletti	8.35	12.01	8.35	15.39	DNF	8.54	12.09
15	Giovanni Pische	10.94	12.16	12.77	12.58	11.72	12.17	10.94
16	Marco Giordano	10.20	12.41	11.79	14.89	10.20	12.17	13.28
17	Alessio Pandin	8.44	12.44	13.10	13.30	8.44	12.39	11.82
18	Giacomo Amati	10.12	12.53	13.04	13.65	12.07	12.49	10.12
19	Marco Guarasci	11.49	12.96	11.49	12.25	DNF	12.45	14.17
20	Giovanni Montagna Coronado	11.41	13.03	14.65	13.71	11.41	13.17	12.20

Placement, best single and official average with every attempt in order. Best and worst counting solves are marked. DNF and DNS are never treated as times.