Competition Analysis for Washtenaw Spring A 2023: Choose a Report to View Below

#	Competitor	Best	Average	1	2	3
1	James Hildreth	1:59.76	2:02.15	1:59.76	2:05.82	2:00.88
2	Daniel Karnaukh	2:00.32	2:05.41	2:00.32	2:11.55	2:04.37
3	Quinn Lawson	2:00.11	2:07.11	2:20.04	2:00.11	2:01.18
4	Evan Brown	1:54.29	2:10.41	2:23.21	2:13.74	1:54.29
5	Darshan Bhavanasi	2:04.80	2:11.61	2:21.67	2:08.37	2:04.80
6	Sean Cutshaw	2:06.35	2:12.01	2:21.50	2:06.35	2:08.19
7	Owen Widdis	2:09.49	2:18.02	2:26.92	2:17.64	2:09.49
8	Daniel Pavelich	2:35.34	2:40.61	2:45.15	2:41.34	2:35.34
9	Eli Ozsvath	2:40.82	2:49.15	2:52.09	2:40.82	2:54.53
10	Zachary Giesken	2:41.05	2:51.05	2:41.05	2:56.75	2:55.36
11	Justin Sui	2:52.58	2:57.54	2:55.47	2:52.58	3:04.56
12	Ashton Froude	3:01.08	3:04.29	3:01.08	3:02.40	3:09.38
13	Yuxuan Chen	3:06.63	3:11.57	3:06.63	3:13.15	3:14.93
14	Luke Pearson	3:12.73	3:40.75	3:12.73	4:09.88	3:39.65
15	Dominic Cater	3:39.24	3:42.44	3:43.42	3:44.65	3:39.24
16	Zachary Garber	3:28.80	3:44.22	3:40.80	4:03.06	3:28.80
17	Caleb Lalik	3:35.83	3:44.82	3:35.83	4:02.61	3:36.01
18	Evan Schulz	3:32.58	3:56.68	3:32.58	3:59.27	4:18.20
19	Liam Strauch	4:03.26	—	4:03.26	—	—
20	Yichao Li (李伊超)	4:04.27	—	4:04.27	—	—
21	Miles Reavis	4:32.83	—	4:32.83	—	—
22	Hunter Mackler	4:39.40	—	4:39.40	—	—
23	Tyler Rose	4:51.52	—	4:51.52	—	—
24	Mark Sak	5:08.47	—	5:08.47	—	—
25	Rex Ozsvath	5:11.69	—	5:11.69	—	—
26	Nico Ozsvath	5:27.65	—	5:27.65	—	—

Placement, best single and official average with every attempt in order. Best and worst counting solves are marked. DNF and DNS are never treated as times.