Competition Analysis for Solving in the South Invercargill 2025: Choose a Report to View Below

#	Competitor	Best	Average	1	2	3	4	5
1	Henry Eyles	29.53	30.77	32.14	29.53	32.57	29.88	30.29
2	Daniel Fraser	34.50	36.99	37.42	38.68	34.50	45.20	34.86
3	James Dyer	35.80	39.79	35.80	41.53	40.79	39.79	38.78
4	Luke Steele	43.37	49.98	1:01.90	50.75	43.37	54.48	44.72
5	Gabe Smith	54.90	56.56	54.90	57.08	57.30	1:06.52	55.29
6	Beau Brittain-Modesto	44.96	58.82	44.96	54.54	1:07.73	54.19	2:04.61
7	Oscar Childs	55.15	1:04.35	1:13.40	55.15	1:05.12	1:05.58	1:02.35
8	Flynn Allan	1:05.94	1:15.29	1:18.89	1:05.94	1:23.09	1:17.22	1:09.76
9	Julia Eyles	1:38.00	1:43.21	1:49.12	1:44.26	1:42.80	1:38.00	1:42.56
10	Mehul Pankaj Girhotra	1:15.78	1:44.69	1:59.49	1:52.27	1:44.06	1:37.75	1:15.78

Placement, best single and official average with every attempt in order. Best and worst counting solves are marked. DNF and DNS are never treated as times.