Competition Analysis for Solving in Sale 2019: Choose a Report to View Below

#	Competitor	Best	Average	1	2	3	4	5
1	Andy Gong	1:07.77	1:11.56	1:14.21	1:07.77	1:10.44	1:15.38	1:10.02
2	Will Gurnett	1:09.62	1:14.03	1:11.96	1:24.42	1:09.62	1:15.15	1:14.99
3	Oscar Watson	1:17.37	1:23.24	1:34.36	1:22.17	1:17.37	1:24.14	1:23.40
4	Ethan Pride	1:28.10	1:33.62	1:28.10	1:30.61	1:39.98	1:30.28	1:56.00
5	Riley Dexter	1:23.50	1:37.24	1:23.50	1:43.15	1:34.34	1:36.29	1:41.10
6	Calven Lipec	1:35.90	1:41.97	1:38.73	1:49.48	2:03.50	1:35.90	1:37.69
7	Jack Cai	1:44.50	1:54.28	2:06.47	1:49.19	1:44.50	1:47.18	2:10.37
8	Sebastian Outh-Aut	1:53.57	2:03.87	2:40.00	1:53.57	2:06.89	2:09.61	1:55.10
9	Tim Handmer	2:13.73	2:22.08	2:13.73	2:36.41	2:26.40	2:22.74	2:17.11
10	Wesley Allen	2:18.28	2:27.94	2:18.28	2:27.16	2:44.39	2:33.34	2:23.32
11	Phoenix Patterson	2:20.28	2:34.18	2:20.28	2:48.80	2:33.38	2:36.45	2:32.70
12	Sebastian Robbins	2:24.87	2:38.47	2:24.87	2:35.65	2:54.21	2:29.60	2:50.17
13	David Edwards	2:43.62	—	2:43.62	2:48.73	—	—	—
14	John McGill	3:09.78	—	3:41.09	3:09.78	—	—	—

Placement, best single and official average with every attempt in order. Best and worst counting solves are marked. DNF and DNS are never treated as times.