Competition Analysis for Roskilde by Vote 2016: Choose a Report to View Below

#	Competitor	Best	Average	1	2	3	4	5
1	Martin Vædele Egdal	9.27	10.30	10.64	10.21	10.06	10.89	9.27
2	Hampus Hellqvist	8.61	10.57	11.35	8.61	10.35	13.45	10.00
3	Nathaniel Berg	9.56	10.91	9.79	11.40	12.44	11.53	9.56
4	Rasmus Stub Detlefsen	10.89	11.59	14.18	10.89	11.37	11.22	12.17
5	Oscar Roth Andersen	9.16	11.76	12.00	14.48	9.16	13.03	10.25
6	Karina Grandjean Beck	11.38	12.76	13.51	11.38	16.81	12.50	12.28
7	Peter Nielsen	10.82	12.89	11.57	14.35	10.82	14.97	12.75
8	Henrik Buus Aagaard	11.59	12.90	12.46	12.54	15.06	13.71	11.59
9	Lars Vennike Nielsson	11.62	13.37	14.02	13.32	12.77	11.62	15.01
10	Micki Kanaiya Harning	10.69	13.94	14.87	16.88	10.69	14.03	12.93
11	Fredrik Abildgaard Trondhjem	12.53	14.09	13.68	16.69	12.53	13.36	15.22
12	Christian Smedegaard	14.22	15.14	14.22	15.04	15.60	16.33	14.77
13	Daniel Vædele Egdal	14.03	15.18	14.03	15.89	14.34	16.21	15.30
14	Carl Fiig Jarner	13.05	15.38	13.93	17.00	15.20	23.03	13.05
15	Victor Valentin Glyrskov	14.00	16.43	16.39	16.84	16.05	14.00	17.06
16	Darja Makurina	14.01	16.92	18.21	15.27	14.01	19.87	17.28
17	Magnus Patrick Kanstrup	15.89	17.14	16.72	19.67	15.89	16.77	17.93
18	Rasmus Guldager	15.24	17.69	16.43	18.60	18.03	15.24	30.90
19	Zoé de Moffarts	15.88	18.31	18.06	17.36	15.88	DNF	19.51
20	Matias Rasmussen	16.59	19.91	25.01	16.79	17.92	16.59	DNF

Placement, best single and official average with every attempt in order. Best and worst counting solves are marked. DNF and DNS are never treated as times.