Competition Analysis for Pi Cubing Hvidovre 2026: Choose a Report to View Below

#	Competitor	Best	Average	1	2	3	4	5
1	Frank Lindblom	1.76	1.98	2.13	1.94	1.87	1.76	2.15
2	Daniel Vædele Egdal	2.27	2.57	2.27	2.59	2.81	2.88	2.30
3	Martin Vædele Egdal	3.10	3.73	3.90	3.43	3.85	4.26	3.10
4	Ianis Costin Chele	2.17	4.07	4.85	7.77	2.17	4.52	2.84
5	Rasmus Stub Detlefsen	2.74	4.60	9.08	3.01	3.05	7.75	2.74
6	Victor Valentin Glyrskov	3.78	4.60	3.78	4.03	5.64	4.13	DNF
7	Adam Marcellus Kelly	3.72	4.76	3.80	5.35	9.40	5.12	3.72
8	Silje Stevnsborg Nielsen	5.08	5.89	5.08	6.08	6.27	5.33	7.36
9	Isak Gylling Roepstorff	5.44	6.02	5.65	6.23	5.44	6.44	6.18
10	Bo Alfredsson	5.30	6.25	5.30	5.31	7.20	6.23	7.79
11	Silas Kampp Richter Lassen	4.49	6.63	4.49	6.15	7.46	7.75	6.28
12	Clément Cherblanc	4.46	6.89	7.81	10.61	4.46	6.31	6.54
13	Andreas Friis Thorkildsen	3.13	7.09	7.01	6.24	DNF	8.03	3.13
14	Benjamin Bjerring Bach	4.28	7.13	4.28	7.46	8.57	7.81	6.11
15	Anton Lerstrup Hylleberg	5.33	7.31	5.33	6.85	5.74	9.33	11.91
16	Maica Neri Birch Sjøstrand	6.46	7.46	8.71	6.49	10.04	6.46	7.17
17	Daniel Berndt Lemvigh	5.29	7.73	5.29	7.32	7.81	10.69	8.07
18	Oana-Simona Vrabie	6.29	9.30	12.11	9.40	6.29	7.63	10.86
19	Itay Shahar	7.10	9.46	8.89	8.70	13.49	7.10	10.79
20	Thor Muto Asmund	7.13	14.55	7.13	21.14	DNF	7.47	15.05
21	Matteo Provasi	13.99	16.02	15.45	15.61	20.13	13.99	16.99

Placement, best single and official average with every attempt in order. Best and worst counting solves are marked. DNF and DNS are never treated as times.