Competition Analysis for Pi Cubing Hvidovre 2026: Choose a Report to View Below

#	Competitor	Best	Average	1	2	3	4	5
1	Martin Vædele Egdal	1.33	1.54	2.79	1.39	1.33	1.83	1.41
2	Ianis Costin Chele	1.27	1.60	2.09	1.61	1.68	1.27	1.52
3	Adam Marcellus Kelly	1.68	1.90	1.68	1.81	2.04	1.84	3.91
4	Frank Lindblom	1.33	2.02	2.36	1.58	1.33	3.13	2.11
5	Daniel Vædele Egdal	1.47	2.09	2.66	1.76	2.42	1.47	2.10
6	Victor Valentin Glyrskov	1.51	2.13	2.15	2.08	1.51	3.55	2.17
7	Rasmus Stub Detlefsen	1.71	2.43	1.89	1.71	3.94	3.24	2.16
8	Benjamin Bjerring Bach	2.09	2.48	2.41	2.63	2.09	2.39	3.36
9	Anton Lerstrup Hylleberg	2.06	2.60	2.75	2.25	2.06	3.38	2.81
10	Itay Shahar	2.74	3.46	2.74	3.78	4.01	3.22	3.38
11	Isak Gylling Roepstorff	1.80	3.47	2.23	6.80	1.80	4.25	3.92
12	Matteo Provasi	3.23	3.57	3.70	3.46	3.23	3.82	3.56
13	Bo Alfredsson	2.72	4.12	3.20	5.42	7.01	3.73	2.72
14	Ciprian Timotei Olaru	3.46	4.19	3.99	4.46	4.11	3.46	5.53
15	Silje Stevnsborg Nielsen	4.12	4.41	4.43	4.19	5.68	4.12	4.60
16	Andreas Friis Thorkildsen	3.68	4.79	4.19	4.69	5.89	5.48	3.68
17	Callum James Goodyear-Jørgensen	4.07	4.99	5.34	5.28	13.23	4.07	4.35
18	Daniel Berndt Lemvigh	3.81	5.06	4.27	8.32	6.04	4.86	3.81
19	Félix Larsen	4.58	6.02	11.92	5.56	7.12	4.58	5.39
20	Maica Neri Birch Sjøstrand	4.17	6.27	6.22	6.59	9.83	4.17	6.00
21	Nicklas Graae Rasmussen	4.52	6.48	6.46	7.00	9.67	5.99	4.52

Placement, best single and official average with every attempt in order. Best and worst counting solves are marked. DNF and DNS are never treated as times.