Oberlin Challenge I 2026
Sign in to follow3x3x3 Fewest Moves podium
Winners
All resultsPhotos, videos & posts from Oberlin Challenge I 2026
Competition recap
A written summary of Oberlin Challenge I 2026, generated from the official results on this page.
Gibson Clinches Fewest Moves Title in Razor-Thin Oberlin Challenge FinishEnglish
Inside Wilder Hall, competitors spent their allotted time studying scrambles and writing notation under steady concentration. The quiet atmosphere in Oberlin, Ohio, USA defined the single-day gathering on February 15, 2026, where every move on the standard Rubik's Cube was scrutinized. Solving the puzzle with maximum efficiency demands calculating multiple pathways and testing sequences on paper before submitting a final solution sheet. It is a disciplined branch of speedcubing where a margin of a single turn can decide the final standings.
The 2026 tournament saw intense focus directed solely at the 3x3x3 Fewest Moves discipline across two full rounds of play. Oberlin Challenge I 2026 brought together a dedicated field of 10 competitors, testing their knowledge of blockbuilding and algorithmic efficiency. With only one event on the schedule, the entire outcome hinged on producing consistent, short solutions across three distinct scrambles per round. The pressure remained constant throughout the session as contenders searched for optimal insertions.
When the final solution sheets were tallied, Levi Gibson secured victory by a razor-thin margin in the deciding round. Gibson finished with a winning average of 22.67 moves, supported by a round-best single of 22 moves. Runner-up Daichi Halphen pushed the champion to the wire, logging an average of 23.67 moves to finish exactly one move per solve behind Gibson over the course of the average. Halphen also recorded an exceptional 21-move single during the contest, demonstrating how close the race for first place remained.
Zach Baruch completed the podium in third place with an average of 27.33 moves, rounding out a top-three sweep for the USA. Baruch also achieved a strong single solve of 24 moves during the competition, maintaining a solid pace among the leaders. The narrow gap separating Gibson and Halphen highlighted how minor variations in edge orientation or skeleton building can separate the champion from the runner-up in a tightly contested cubing competition.
Beyond the fight for podium spots, several competitors delivered noteworthy individual milestones during the WCA competition. Sean Cutshaw entered the event and produced a major breakthrough, recording a 3x3x3 Fewest Moves personal best single of 26 moves, which improved upon a previous mark of 31 moves by 16.1 percent, on the way to a 4th place finish. Lucas Martin tackled his first ever attempt at 3x3x3 Fewest Moves, navigating the complex format to register a single solve of 36 moves and secure 5th place overall.
Other participants also made their mark in the standings through reliable execution across the rounds. Braden Richards put together a focused showing in the 10-person field to finish 6th in 3x3x3 Fewest Moves with a single solve of 27 moves. Jack Pfeifer completed the event with a best single solve of 30 moves and an average of 36.67 moves, earning 7th place in the final table.
International presence was represented by Shuxiu Jiang from China, who posted a best single of 42 moves during the competition. Meanwhile, Evan Brown also recorded sharp solutions in the event, logging a single of 23 moves and a 24.00 average, and Keenan Darkins completed his attempts with a 32-move single and a 35.67 average. Every participant at the table contributed to a deep, analytical day of speed cubing, working through challenging scrambles move by move.
The specialized nature of the schedule gave this gathering a distinct identity, centering entirely on theoretical depth and minimal move counts rather than raw turning speed. With the 3x3 results finalized, the participants concluded a focused weekend of technical solving. Oberlin Challenge I 2026 demonstrated that few disciplines in the sport can match the tension and precision of a head-to-head FMC battle decided by the slimmest of margins.