
Competition Analysis for Guangzhou Special 2026: Choose a Report to View Below
Controls for this report
Official standings exactly as the WCA recorded them.
Results — Skewb, Final
20 competitors
| # | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1.54 | 2.02 | 1.83 | DNF | 2.50 | 1.54 | 1.73 | |
| 2 | 2.35 | 2.72 | 2.88 | 2.85 | 4.53 | 2.35 | 2.44 | |
| 3 | 2.37 | 3.23 | 3.43 | 4.05 | 3.35 | 2.90 | 2.37 | |
| 4 | 2.11 | 3.25 | 4.60 | 4.37 | 2.87 | 2.52 | 2.11 | |
| 5 | 2.45 | 3.26 | 3.45 | 3.56 | 4.52 | 2.76 | 2.45 | |
| 6 | 2.55 | 3.52 | 4.11 | 5.85 | 3.52 | 2.92 | 2.55 | |
| 7 | 2.05 | 3.98 | 5.18 | 4.05 | 3.81 | 4.08 | 2.05 | |
| 8 | 3.76 | 4.07 | 3.89 | 3.85 | 4.47 | 3.76 | 5.30 | |
| 9 | 2.55 | 4.37 | 4.17 | 6.26 | 3.47 | 2.55 | 5.46 | |
| 10 | 3.18 | 4.48 | 4.14 | 4.78 | 5.68 | 3.18 | 4.52 | |
| 11 | 3.18 | 4.61 | 4.62 | 4.82 | 4.56 | 4.65 | 3.18 | |
| 12 | 2.98 | 4.70 | 4.04 | 2.98 | 5.39 | 4.68 | 6.02 | |
| 13 | 3.32 | 4.98 | 15.42 | 3.32 | 5.97 | 5.23 | 3.75 | |
| 14 | 4.80 | 5.14 | 5.17 | 8.65 | 4.80 | 4.99 | 5.25 | |
| 15 | 3.75 | 5.32 | 5.62 | 3.75 | 5.26 | 5.54 | 5.15 | |
| 16 | 4.62 | 5.40 | 5.42 | 4.62 | 6.39 | 4.92 | 5.87 | |
| 17 | 5.06 | 5.51 | 9.12 | 5.06 | 5.45 | 5.64 | 5.44 | |
| 18 | 4.87 | 5.89 | 4.87 | 6.19 | 6.33 | 7.38 | 5.14 | |
| 19 | 4.82 | 6.33 | 6.79 | 8.77 | 5.08 | 4.82 | 7.12 | |
| 20 | 4.24 | 6.63 | 9.73 | 10.82 | 4.78 | 5.39 | 4.24 |
Placement, best single and official average with every attempt in order. Best and worst counting solves are marked. DNF and DNS are never treated as times.