
Competition Analysis for Guangzhou Special 2025: Choose a Report to View Below
Controls for this report
Official standings exactly as the WCA recorded them.
Results — Skewb, Final
20 competitors
| # | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1.76 | 2.28 | 2.09 | 2.40 | 2.36 | 1.76 | 3.47 | |
| 2 | 2.01 | 2.47 | 2.39 | 2.01 | 3.06 | 2.53 | 2.50 | |
| 3 | 1.56 | 2.68 | 2.17 | 3.12 | 2.76 | 1.56 | 3.95 | |
| 4 | 1.92 | 2.68 | 1.92 | 2.97 | 4.46 | 2.67 | 2.40 | |
| 5 | 1.52 | 2.76 | 1.52 | 2.90 | 4.64 | 3.00 | 2.39 | |
| 6 | 2.13 | 3.05 | 2.13 | 3.89 | 4.86 | 2.54 | 2.73 | |
| 7 | 2.51 | 3.21 | 2.51 | 3.78 | 3.97 | 2.95 | 2.91 | |
| 8 | 2.44 | 3.26 | 2.44 | 3.92 | 2.99 | 2.86 | 4.06 | |
| 9 | 2.63 | 3.93 | 2.63 | 4.84 | 5.79 | 3.88 | 3.08 | |
| 10 | 3.60 | 4.36 | 3.60 | 3.65 | 4.93 | 6.00 | 4.49 | |
| 11 | 3.55 | 4.63 | DNF | 4.15 | 4.38 | 5.37 | 3.55 | |
| 12 | 2.92 | 4.71 | 2.92 | 4.58 | 5.34 | 4.20 | 6.77 | |
| 13 | 3.96 | 4.90 | 5.92 | 5.36 | 3.96 | 4.96 | 4.39 | |
| 14 | 3.57 | 4.96 | 3.57 | 6.85 | 4.03 | 4.01 | 7.15 | |
| 15 | 3.46 | 5.13 | 3.46 | 4.58 | 4.59 | 6.95 | 6.22 | |
| 16 | 3.40 | 5.18 | 3.40 | 4.82 | 7.53 | 5.86 | 4.86 | |
| 17 | 2.92 | 5.76 | 2.92 | 5.83 | 7.36 | 5.73 | 5.73 | |
| 18 | 3.64 | 6.09 | 3.64 | 6.59 | 5.55 | 6.41 | 6.30 | |
| 19 | 4.47 | 6.31 | 12.52 | 4.47 | 7.98 | 5.65 | 5.31 | |
| 20 | 5.00 | 6.96 | 5.00 | 8.74 | 7.74 | 6.00 | 7.13 |
Placement, best single and official average with every attempt in order. Best and worst counting solves are marked. DNF and DNS are never treated as times.