Competition Analysis for Eretum IV 2025: Choose a Report to View Below

#	Competitor	Best	Average	1	2	3	4	5
1	Gabriele Fabellini	7.65	8.48	9.18	8.52	8.16	7.65	8.77
2	Manfredi Italiano	7.03	8.79	10.53	8.44	7.03	11.06	7.41
3	Nicolo David Lodato	8.34	9.33	10.60	8.80	8.34	10.07	9.13
4	Alessandro Galloppo	8.28	9.65	9.76	10.49	8.69	11.18	8.28
5	Sofia Saletnich	9.25	10.03	11.72	11.11	9.25	9.51	9.46
6	Matteo Bonotto	8.86	10.12	10.28	13.02	10.47	9.61	8.86
7	Michel D'Antoni	8.88	10.59	11.30	8.88	10.54	10.77	10.45
8	Edoardo Annesi	10.12	10.85	10.12	13.97	11.89	10.47	10.18
9	Simone Molinari	8.47	11.01	10.54	8.47	15.08	10.86	11.62
10	Tea Raimondi Vallesi	11.22	11.46	13.40	11.61	11.34	11.43	11.22
11	Pietro Gori	10.57	11.56	12.39	10.57	10.84	17.65	11.46
12	Flavio Tranquilli	9.82	11.88	11.12	11.97	12.55	9.82	12.71
13	Giovanni Pische	12.13	12.78	13.06	13.02	16.39	12.13	12.25
14	Valerio Maggi	10.25	13.37	10.25	13.73	12.82	13.56	15.30
15	Vadim Svezhentsev	12.41	13.61	12.41	13.52	DNF	14.27	13.05
16	Mongol Forti	10.34	13.91	14.76	13.53	10.34	13.43	16.04
17	Francesco Palma	11.80	13.95	11.83	18.02	11.80	13.89	16.12
18	Gabriele Cappelletti	9.68	14.45	16.88	9.68	13.49	12.98	DNF
19	Paolo Cosimi	13.60	14.56	16.08	13.60	14.50	14.80	14.37
20	Luciano Brunetti	13.19	14.98	16.38	13.19	14.80	15.87	14.28

Placement, best single and official average with every attempt in order. Best and worst counting solves are marked. DNF and DNS are never treated as times.