Competition Analysis for Eretum II: Easter Edition 2024: Choose a Report to View Below

#	Competitor	Best	Average	1	2	3	4	5
1	Flavio Rimi	7.55	8.19	10.37	7.88	8.36	8.32	7.55
2	Sofia Saletnich	8.13	8.60	9.31	8.34	8.13	8.54	8.92
3	Alessandro Nicolì	7.20	8.74	8.71	8.97	8.54	7.20	10.13
4	Vittorio Ribechini	7.35	9.18	9.10	9.83	7.35	8.61	10.21
5	Edoardo Annesi	9.03	9.43	9.29	9.04	9.03	13.28	9.97
6	Manfredi Italiano	7.76	9.90	9.64	10.06	11.03	10.00	7.76
7	Daniel Sebastian Barnea	8.64	10.30	9.73	8.64	12.37	10.02	11.14
8	Claudio Valente	8.33	10.39	12.16	8.33	12.08	9.59	9.50
9	Simone Cantarelli	9.45	10.47	9.87	11.05	10.48	11.82	9.45
10	Michel D'Antoni	9.83	10.73	11.33	9.83	11.73	10.08	10.78
11	Diego Catà	9.92	10.93	11.85	11.04	10.16	11.60	9.92
12	Nicolo David Lodato	6.24	10.94	11.79	10.59	6.24	10.44	11.95
13	Marco Rota	10.09	11.05	10.70	11.02	11.42	15.08	10.09
14	Matteo Bonotto	9.93	11.13	9.93	10.71	13.18	11.78	10.89
15	Matteo Provasi	9.25	11.26	9.25	9.77	12.79	11.53	12.48
16	Andrea Fissi	8.86	11.43	9.68	8.86	14.04	10.56	DNF
17	Leonardo Carosio	10.61	11.72	10.82	11.40	10.61	12.95	DNF
18	Gabriele Cappelletti	10.64	12.39	10.64	DNF	12.30	13.88	11.00
19	Francesco Palma	12.47	13.47	12.47	13.51	14.48	13.52	13.37
20	Flavio Tranquilli	12.45	13.59	12.98	14.70	16.72	13.10	12.45
21	Leonardo Oppi	12.10	13.73	17.24	12.10	15.12	12.47	13.61
22	Daniel Christopher Lehn	10.87	13.88	10.87	14.46	14.48	17.83	12.71
23	Giovanni Pische	11.30	14.85	14.82	13.97	15.77	16.81	11.30
24	Hermes Spahi	14.23	16.31	14.23	17.94	19.90	16.46	14.53

Placement, best single and official average with every attempt in order. Best and worst counting solves are marked. DNF and DNS are never treated as times.