Competition Analysis for Eretum I 2024: Choose a Report to View Below

#	Competitor	Best	Average	1	2	3	4	5
1	Valerio Locatelli	6.24	6.66	7.98	6.52	7.07	6.39	6.24
2	Sofia Saletnich	8.43	8.83	8.57	8.83	9.09	10.14	8.43
3	Giovanni Centili	8.71	9.24	9.73	10.43	8.99	8.71	9.01
4	Lorenzo Mauro	8.31	9.58	10.14	8.31	10.49	9.45	9.16
5	Flavio Rimi	7.96	9.63	11.56	10.45	9.11	9.34	7.96
6	Claudio Valente	9.08	9.71	10.58	9.95	9.50	9.08	9.68
7	Alessandro Galloppo	8.94	9.93	11.67	10.09	10.27	8.94	9.44
8	Carolina Sozio	8.88	9.94	9.99	9.86	8.88	12.00	9.98
9	Manfredi Italiano	7.96	9.95	10.15	7.96	9.88	10.25	9.81
10	Daniel Sebastian Barnea	8.43	10.43	10.89	10.61	9.78	13.87	8.43
11	Diego Catà	10.52	11.03	11.02	10.91	10.52	11.90	11.15
12	Edoardo Annesi	10.48	11.11	10.68	11.57	10.48	11.08	14.13
13	Christian Crea	10.63	11.41	10.69	15.97	10.63	11.39	12.14
14	Gabriele Cappelletti	10.07	11.44	11.27	10.07	10.69	12.72	12.37
15	Matteo Provasi	9.80	11.47	10.51	12.24	11.98	9.80	11.93
16	Vittorio Ribechini	8.78	11.80	13.12	10.80	13.96	8.78	11.47
17	Damiano Catà	9.01	11.87	13.02	9.01	12.02	10.58	13.97
18	Davide Arnesano	10.28	11.98	10.28	11.65	15.94	13.27	11.03
19	Tea Raimondi Vallesi	11.43	12.33	11.63	13.19	14.79	11.43	12.18
20	Michel D'Antoni	10.21	12.52	10.21	11.36	13.76	12.81	13.38
21	Leonardo Oppi	11.06	12.74	11.74	11.06	13.61	15.26	12.87
22	Andrea Fissi	10.99	12.87	13.80	12.10	12.72	14.07	10.99
23	Giovanni Piscitelli	12.75	13.11	12.75	12.94	12.93	14.24	13.47
24	Andrea Gaggioli	14.21	14.88	14.21	15.01	15.86	15.18	14.44

Placement, best single and official average with every attempt in order. Best and worst counting solves are marked. DNF and DNS are never treated as times.