Competition Analysis for Eretum 2: Chocolate Edition 2026: Choose a Report to View Below

#	Competitor	Best	Average	1	2	3	4	5
1	Alessandro Zangolini	5.40	8.05	8.09	5.40	8.94	8.68	7.39
2	Flavio Rimi	6.88	8.26	8.63	6.88	9.41	7.77	8.37
3	Sofia Saletnich	7.52	8.36	8.69	8.13	11.48	7.52	8.25
4	Gabriele Fabellini	7.65	9.17	10.74	7.65	8.91	7.85	11.08
5	Simone Cantarelli	8.21	9.61	9.23	10.77	8.21	8.97	10.64
6	Matteo Provasi	8.92	9.62	8.92	10.12	9.71	11.36	9.04
7	Diego Catà	8.96	9.74	8.96	10.50	11.84	9.36	9.36
8	Michel D'Antoni	9.74	10.45	9.75	9.88	14.77	11.71	9.74
9	Pietro Gori	9.42	10.50	9.62	9.42	10.56	14.12	11.31
10	Gabriele Cappelletti	9.34	10.59	11.03	10.49	11.62	9.34	10.25
11	Davide Arnesano	10.19	11.38	12.42	11.12	10.19	14.55	10.60
12	Flavio Tranquilli	10.30	11.42	10.30	11.21	13.27	11.58	11.47
13	Luca Dario Movila	10.69	11.70	11.21	13.08	12.54	10.69	11.35
14	Luciano Brunetti	11.38	12.37	11.38	12.21	12.60	13.28	12.29
15	Giovanni Pische	11.05	12.65	13.53	12.48	11.93	11.05	14.03
16	Francesco Palma	11.39	12.99	12.22	11.39	12.84	13.92	16.10
17	Thomas Nettleship	11.99	13.24	11.99	13.32	13.71	14.75	12.68
18	Vadim Svezhentsev	11.87	13.43	11.87	14.44	13.14	13.02	14.12
19	Simone Donadio	10.93	13.84	14.04	13.79	13.69	10.93	14.49
20	Leonardo Santrayll	12.41	14.30	13.37	15.34	15.51	14.18	12.41
21	Tommaso Iascone	13.75	14.83	14.27	17.23	13.75	16.03	14.18
22	Alessia Novizio	12.15	15.08	16.92	12.15	17.89	15.40	12.92
23	Lorenzo Martini	15.25	15.56	15.37	15.74	15.25	15.57	18.25
24	Tommaso Ragona	12.75	16.13	15.28	16.81	16.30	17.28	12.75

Placement, best single and official average with every attempt in order. Best and worst counting solves are marked. DNF and DNS are never treated as times.