Competition Analysis for Cubing 4 a Cure Farmington 2023: Choose a Report to View Below

#	Competitor	Best	Average	1	2	3	4	5
1	Jack Manzo	8.66	9.27	9.34	9.54	8.66	9.72	8.94
2	William Harris	9.10	9.62	9.10	9.28	10.46	12.17	9.12
3	Quinn Lawson	8.48	9.64	10.00	9.72	10.88	9.21	8.48
4	Ben Saperstein	8.27	9.88	10.40	8.81	8.27	12.02	10.43
5	Asher Kaftan	9.48	10.01	10.46	9.99	9.48	9.57	12.08
6	Ezra Shere	7.27	10.05	11.43	7.27	11.36	8.66	10.12
7	Braden Richards	9.16	10.42	9.42	13.09	9.16	10.23	11.60
8	Joel Aber	9.81	10.89	10.74	11.62	10.30	9.81	13.31
9	Ansel de Jong	10.60	11.52	10.60	14.06	10.64	12.84	11.08
10	Steven Wintringham	10.71	11.58	11.86	10.71	12.04	10.83	15.10
11	Caleb Ashley	10.04	11.64	10.04	10.34	12.06	12.53	13.31
12	Ethan Wolf	10.02	11.76	16.34	11.70	10.02	10.08	13.51
13	Hunter Mackler	10.05	11.88	12.33	10.73	10.05	14.29	12.58
14	Kohki Fukuda	10.09	12.09	10.09	10.11	14.41	12.38	13.79
15	Henry Daniel Kosick	11.07	12.22	12.65	11.07	11.14	14.71	12.86
16	Thomas Grahor	10.74	12.27	14.10	12.24	12.31	12.26	10.74
17	Alexander Preston	12.53	13.59	14.66	12.90	16.25	13.20	12.53
18	Nithin Ramkumar	11.08	13.97	17.51	13.98	11.08	14.06	13.88
19	Zachary Pollock	13.90	14.52	14.30	14.96	14.41	13.90	14.86
20	Kelton Eric William Kyro	14.59	14.77	14.90	14.83	14.59	14.59	15.45
21	Justin Sui	12.78	14.86	16.40	12.78	15.21	14.98	14.38
22	Miles Reavis	12.10	15.04	13.90	16.92	15.75	12.10	15.46
23	Timothy Townley	12.57	15.85	14.97	12.57	17.68	16.60	15.99

Placement, best single and official average with every attempt in order. Best and worst counting solves are marked. DNF and DNS are never treated as times.