Competition Analysis for Cube Against Cancer Hanoi 2026: Choose a Report to View Below

#	Competitor	Best	Average	1	2	3	4	5
1	Nông Quốc Duy	1.42	1.80	1.42	2.45	1.57	2.03	1.81
2	Nguyễn Tùng Dương	2.54	2.82	2.63	2.74	3.08	5.51	2.54
3	Hồ Đức Minh	1.55	2.86	1.55	3.98	2.16	2.43	7.66
4	Trần Đình Anh	2.03	2.89	3.06	3.29	3.65	2.32	2.03
5	Đặng Trần Diễn	2.37	2.93	2.37	3.62	2.85	2.93	3.02
6	Chu Tiến Đạt	2.10	3.00	2.25	4.48	4.38	2.38	2.10
7	Hoàng Hà Thủy Tiên	2.20	3.04	3.63	2.87	2.20	3.24	3.01
8	Nguyễn Anh Khôi	2.60	3.20	4.15	2.60	7.70	2.70	2.76
9	Nguyễn Vũ Năng	2.63	3.39	3.61	4.92	3.65	2.63	2.92
10	Nông Quốc Khánh	2.66	3.60	5.19	3.00	2.66	3.95	3.85
11	Malte Oliver Bøgh Kjøller	3.02	4.06	3.54	6.59	3.02	4.12	4.52
12	Phạm Đức Phước	2.38	4.29	4.77	4.63	3.47	2.38	9.32
13	Trương Quốc An	3.36	4.37	5.51	4.64	4.72	3.75	3.36
14	Đặng Khoa Nguyên	2.85	4.45	4.69	14.63	4.38	4.28	2.85
15	Ngô Minh Đức	2.14	4.59	4.58	5.56	3.64	5.91	2.14
16	Nguyễn Phúc Đạt	3.02	4.62	3.43	5.66	3.02	7.10	4.76
17	Nguyễn Hoàng Minh	3.76	4.81	3.76	6.17	4.51	5.61	4.30
18	Đỗ Ken	3.61	4.91	6.28	4.02	DNF	3.61	4.44
19	Đào Hoàng Minh	2.43	4.95	5.91	6.09	6.32	2.84	2.43
20	Nguyễn Lê Hoàng	1.95	5.21	6.39	5.49	4.82	1.95	5.32
21	Lê Việt Lâm	2.43	5.21	6.86	DNF	4.46	4.32	2.43
22	Nguyễn Đức Quân	4.46	5.99	6.61	4.46	6.74	12.97	4.62
23	Nguyễn Đức Dương	1.96	7.54	5.92	DNF	14.66	1.96	2.03
24	Nguyễn Hải Dương	4.30	7.61	14.11	9.53	8.11	4.30	5.18

Placement, best single and official average with every attempt in order. Best and worst counting solves are marked. DNF and DNS are never treated as times.