Competition Analysis for Cookeville Cube Challenge 2026: Choose a Report to View Below

#	Competitor	Best	Average	1	2	3	4	5
1	Andreas Lambropoulos	7.09	8.73	7.09	20.76	8.15	8.69	9.36
2	Katie Hull	7.65	8.85	7.65	8.14	9.48	8.92	10.39
3	Eli Parker	6.82	8.94	8.40	8.43	9.98	6.82	10.60
4	Jared Stinson	8.06	9.11	8.06	9.53	8.64	9.17	9.57
5	Owen Gilder	7.48	9.19	9.03	8.63	10.28	9.90	7.48
6	Srianiketh Prashanth	9.36	9.80	11.95	9.88	9.58	9.36	9.94
7	Micah Morrison	7.10	9.83	8.56	11.13	11.06	7.10	9.86
8	Benjamin Pingel	9.92	10.61	10.44	9.92	11.80	10.02	11.38
9	Thomas Kohann	9.36	10.64	9.58	10.91	11.42	9.36	12.14
10	Isaiah Garrison	8.85	10.88	12.19	11.43	8.85	12.13	9.09
11	Thomas Pham	8.25	11.18	8.25	12.26	13.31	12.85	8.43
12	Coby Wilson	8.67	11.42	12.95	9.94	12.25	8.67	12.06
13	William Vandergrift	10.21	11.89	11.87	12.04	11.75	10.21	12.24
14	Caleb Scheets	10.11	12.24	12.47	13.04	14.86	10.11	11.20
15	Lincoln Kim	9.97	12.31	11.88	11.09	13.97	9.97	14.23
16	Joseph Zaiden	10.51	12.62	14.66	12.68	14.65	10.52	10.51
17	Clay Moore	11.83	12.73	21.04	12.14	13.82	11.83	12.24
18	Charlie Surtees	10.20	12.75	12.69	13.39	12.25	13.32	10.20
19	Elliot Drayer	11.99	13.01	12.23	11.99	13.80	13.00	13.92
20	Annye Bennett	11.37	13.19	14.24	13.31	11.37	12.01	16.05
21	Ethan William Cox	11.86	13.64	14.73	11.86	13.20	13.00	DNF
22	Saketh Ram Prashanth	14.15	14.82	14.49	14.15	14.64	16.91	15.32
23	Samuel Simpson	11.87	15.43	11.87	14.26	15.66	21.16	16.36
24	Nathan Smith	14.96	16.65	16.20	14.96	19.45	16.59	17.15

Placement, best single and official average with every attempt in order. Best and worst counting solves are marked. DNF and DNS are never treated as times.