Competition Analysis for Wakefield MA Spring 2026: Choose a Report to View Below

#	Competitor	Best	Average	1	2	3	4	5
1	Brendan Lee	30.46	32.76	33.23	32.59	30.46	32.46	41.78
2	Aidan McKenzie	35.53	37.77	37.27	35.53	35.88	40.64	40.17
3	Daniyal Suleimen	40.08	42.22	42.88	42.57	40.08	46.83	41.21
4	Justin Lee	41.87	46.57	51.20	46.13	50.46	43.11	41.87
5	Jason Wickman	49.23	51.42	49.23	49.24	50.92	58.65	54.09
6	Matthew Jalkut	51.26	56.03	1:06.29	52.75	58.22	51.26	57.11
7	David Andron-Silva	54.88	58.52	1:01.82	56.18	1:04.95	57.55	54.88
8	Derek White	55.10	1:01.72	1:04.32	1:06.55	1:01.25	59.58	55.10
9	Ian Kim	56.59	1:02.76	1:05.40	1:01.17	56.59	1:01.71	1:08.61
10	Will Russo	59.64	1:06.20	1:11.15	59.64	1:09.10	1:03.62	1:05.87
11	Julian Kim	56.40	1:07.81	1:13.74	1:18.36	1:09.46	56.40	1:00.24
12	Cordelia Hu	1:11.04	1:16.38	1:15.35	1:15.56	1:11.04	1:21.94	1:18.24
13	Conner Htoo	1:08.66	1:18.94	1:13.19	1:13.94	DNF	1:29.69	1:08.66
14	Tess Weinstock	1:14.37	1:22.30	1:16.59	1:34.53	1:14.37	1:37.03	1:15.78
15	Ryan Waite	1:23.05	1:27.52	1:33.70	1:23.05	1:25.21	1:32.28	1:25.07
16	Ethan Zhuang	1:36.48	—	1:36.48	1:37.06	—	—	—
17	Diogo Antônio Nienke Batista	1:38.39	—	2:02.40	1:38.39	—	—	—
18	Joshua Burdick	1:41.75	—	1:41.75	2:02.26	—	—	—
19	Jacob Carubia	1:43.53	—	1:43.53	1:50.35	—	—	—
20	Timothy Reid	1:46.31	—	1:46.31	2:18.43	—	—	—
21	Geordie Hine	1:50.65	—	2:26.39	1:50.65	—	—	—
22	Connor Meehan	2:16.45	—	2:16.45	2:22.05	—	—	—
23	Maximilian Wang	2:19.62	—	3:43.40	2:19.62	—	—	—
24	Jay Rangthale	2:19.63	—	2:44.17	2:19.63	—	—	—
25	Oliver Platt	2:31.80	—	2:42.48	2:31.80	—	—	—
26	Alistair Schardl	2:44.00	—	3:01.94	2:44.00	—	—	—
27	Eli Porter	2:47.64	—	2:47.64	2:52.42	—	—	—
28	Syed Mekaeel Ghani	3:12.91	—	3:29.52	3:12.91	—	—	—
29	Jeremy Wang	3:53.12	—	3:53.12	DNF	—	—	—
30	Winston Knight	3:56.55	—	3:56.55	DNF	—	—	—

Placement, best single and official average with every attempt in order. Best and worst counting solves are marked. DNF and DNS are never treated as times.