Competition Analysis for UPenn Spring competition 2009: Choose a Report to View Below

#	Competitor	Best	Average	1	2	3	4	5
1	Dan Cohen	42.81	52.52	59.55	50.77	48.68	42.81	58.11
2	Patrick Jameson	44.21	59.28	1:00.88	1:00.97	56.00	44.21	1:05.72
3	Dene Beardsley	1:09.53	1:13.21	1:09.53	1:13.53	1:24.88	1:14.44	1:11.66
4	John-Michael Clay	1:10.58	—	1:24.40	1:10.58	—	—	—
5	Tim Reynolds	1:12.19	—	1:26.69	1:12.19	—	—	—
6	Stanley Wong	1:13.28	—	1:19.91	1:13.28	—	—	—
7	Siraj Ali	1:15.75	—	1:22.71	1:15.75	—	—	—
8	Will Goodwin	1:32.81	—	1:34.05	1:32.81	—	—	—
9	Lorenzo Bonoan	1:37.93	—	1:37.93	1:56.94	—	—	—
10	Bob Burton	1:42.40	—	1:42.40	1:44.41	—	—	—
11	Jackson Weisman	1:42.83	—	2:25.69	1:42.83	—	—	—
12	Ethan Rosen	1:45.40	—	1:45.40	1:50.97	—	—	—
13	Sam Boyles	1:51.40	—	1:51.61	1:51.40	—	—	—
14	Nathan Kearney	1:56.08	—	2:08.50	1:56.08	—	—	—
15	Stachu Korick	2:13.21	—	2:51.22	2:13.21	—	—	—
16	Sagar Laud	2:14.59	—	DNF	2:14.59	—	—	—
17	Bill Berry	2:14.75	—	2:14.75	2:31.68	—	—	—
18	Aman Karunakaran	2:50.38	—	2:50.38	2:55.38	—	—	—
19	Bruce Norskog	3:07.00	—	3:07.00	6:05.13	—	—	—

Placement, best single and official average with every attempt in order. Best and worst counting solves are marked. DNF and DNS are never treated as times.