Competition Analysis for Trojan Spring 2024: Choose a Report to View Below

#	Competitor	Best	Average	1	2	3	4	5
1	Hunter Mackler	1:13.03	1:15.18	1:13.59	1:15.04	1:13.03	1:16.92	1:18.01
2	Mason Langenderfer	1:07.99	1:18.19	1:07.99	1:21.72	1:15.61	1:25.30	1:17.25
3	Ansel de Jong	1:13.22	1:19.83	1:37.78	1:16.34	1:24.27	1:18.88	1:13.22
4	Zachary Garber	1:26.55	1:39.77	1:26.55	1:39.89	1:42.01	1:37.40	1:43.72
5	Wesley Barwinski	1:31.38	1:43.18	1:35.53	1:50.00	1:44.00	1:54.06	1:31.38
6	Tyler Rose	1:46.90	1:52.21	1:50.94	1:53.05	1:52.63	1:46.90	1:54.23
7	Kayla Brown	1:46.14	2:01.58	2:03.28	1:57.93	1:46.14	2:04.84	2:03.54
8	César Eduardo Loredo Rubio	1:57.16	2:02.80	2:08.61	1:57.39	2:02.39	1:57.16	2:15.47
9	Kelton Eric William Kyro	1:55.43	2:04.30	2:00.61	1:55.43	2:11.44	2:08.72	2:03.56
10	Natapong Kanema	1:47.17	2:04.73	1:47.17	2:08.37	2:12.01	2:00.67	2:05.16
11	Joel Aber	2:00.68	2:21.65	2:29.38	2:00.68	2:23.73	2:23.15	2:18.07
12	Doug Li	2:26.14	—	2:26.14	2:35.60	—	—	—
13	Anders Jacobsen	2:51.43	—	3:45.14	2:51.43	—	—	—

Placement, best single and official average with every attempt in order. Best and worst counting solves are marked. DNF and DNS are never treated as times.