Competition Analysis for Take Your Time Ermelo 2025: Choose a Report to View Below

#	Competitor	Best	Average	1	2	3	4	5
1	Mattheo de Wit	1.63	2.70	2.57	1.63	5.11	2.38	3.15
2	Alessandro van Burken	2.56	3.32	2.83	5.58	3.32	2.56	3.80
3	Elias Malomgré	1.66	3.44	2.09	1.66	3.70	4.54	5.26
4	Ivo Stoutjesdijk	2.45	3.59	8.29	2.45	3.47	3.56	3.74
5	Rick Hamburger	2.54	3.80	3.28	2.54	4.96	4.32	3.80
6	Imanuel Müller	3.28	4.24	3.28	20.68	4.17	4.25	4.31
7	Anja Strydom	3.11	4.78	3.11	5.68	4.28	6.73	4.38
8	Mick Boekema	3.07	4.80	3.07	4.30	4.05	6.04	6.13
9	Florine Zuur	4.55	5.23	5.33	4.89	4.55	5.46	5.58
10	Vincent Chan	4.68	5.29	4.68	6.71	5.24	4.98	5.64
11	Tim van Loo	4.69	5.60	5.00	8.33	6.65	5.16	4.69
12	Per Noordstrand	4.82	6.06	5.17	6.04	4.82	7.16	6.97
13	Stijn de Gooijer	5.14	6.11	5.73	6.80	5.14	5.81	7.36
14	Robin Verstraten	5.09	6.32	5.87	14.51	6.71	5.09	6.39
15	Luca Rengers	4.14	6.40	4.14	6.07	8.22	6.98	6.16
16	Maarten Schuil	5.17	6.48	10.05	6.11	5.17	6.72	6.62
17	Olivier Vos	5.78	6.64	5.82	6.25	7.84	5.78	9.57
18	Casper Hegt	5.78	6.69	10.90	5.89	5.78	6.37	7.82
19	Davian van Plateringen	5.66	6.75	6.57	7.12	6.56	5.66	10.78
20	Daniël Kassab	5.42	6.85	7.78	6.63	6.13	5.42	10.24
21	Jaimy van der Heijden	5.35	7.41	8.23	6.55	5.35	7.45	13.33
22	Jules Porteners	5.66	7.65	6.92	8.38	5.66	7.66	8.42
23	Gijs Peletier	5.22	8.80	5.22	12.98	8.34	9.40	8.65
24	Max Hijstek	6.27	9.43	9.76	8.18	10.44	6.27	10.34

Placement, best single and official average with every attempt in order. Best and worst counting solves are marked. DNF and DNS are never treated as times.