No event poster yet
Registered users can create a commemorative poster image for Taiyuan Winter Open 2016.
Competition Analysis for Taiyuan Winter Open 2016: Choose a Report to View Below
Controls for this report
Official standings exactly as the WCA recorded them.
Results — Skewb, Final
21 competitors
| # | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |  Xun Zhao (赵洵) | 4.90 | 5.76 | 8.40 | 4.90 | 4.98 | 6.25 | 6.04 |
| 2 | Zhiyuan Zhang (张智渊) | 4.93 | 6.11 | 4.93 | 5.77 | 5.98 | 6.59 | DNF |
| 3 | Hongda Li (李洪达) | 6.91 | 8.45 | 7.90 | 8.73 | 8.72 | 6.91 | 10.27 |
| 4 | Bo Wang (王擘) | 5.44 | 8.47 | 8.40 | 5.44 | 7.06 | 9.94 | 12.11 |
| 5 | Hongyu Jiang (姜宏禹) | 7.14 | 8.51 | 20.83 | 7.14 | 7.45 | 7.41 | 10.68 |
| 6 | Yulin Sun (孙玉麟) | 6.69 | 8.79 | 10.31 | 8.83 | 8.18 | 9.35 | 6.69 |
| 7 | Wenfeng Tian (田文峰) | 6.61 | 8.85 | 6.61 | 7.90 | 9.58 | 9.07 | 10.67 |
| 8 | Dasheng Zhao (赵达升) | 7.43 | 9.58 | 9.92 | 7.43 | 10.61 | 8.91 | 9.91 |
| 9 | Jianjun Li (李建军) | 8.04 | 9.68 | 13.47 | 8.04 | 9.32 | 11.49 | 8.23 |
| 10 | Junqi Miao (苗峻绮) | 7.42 | 9.96 | 10.71 | 8.86 | 12.09 | 10.32 | 7.42 |
| 11 | Di Lu (卢迪) | 7.13 | 11.19 | 12.25 | 7.13 | 11.93 | 16.62 | 9.40 |
| 12 | Xiaobo Hou (侯晓博) | 9.06 | 11.63 | 11.15 | 9.06 | 9.51 | 15.71 | 14.23 |
| 13 | Xuankai Lin (蔺玄凯) | 9.87 | 12.59 | 17.03 | 12.84 | 9.99 | 14.94 | 9.87 |
| 14 | Baiqiang Dong (董百强) | 7.42 | 13.05 | 11.64 | 7.42 | 12.28 | 20.68 | 15.24 |
| 15 | Yiming Luo (罗一鸣) | 11.03 | 19.35 | 17.60 | 11.03 | 23.47 | 23.43 | 17.01 |
| 16 | Yunzhou Zhu (朱云舟) | 16.88 | 19.51 | 20.30 | 16.88 | 20.66 | 17.57 | 21.15 |
| 17 | Jimeng Guo (郭冀蒙) | 16.05 | 24.38 | 28.35 | 16.05 | DNF | 23.38 | 21.42 |
| 18 | Shaojie Guo (郭绍捷) | 18.66 | 26.59 | 18.83 | 34.05 | 18.66 | 27.21 | 33.72 |
| 19 | Ruijie Yang (杨瑞杰) | 13.45 | 27.16 | 29.56 | 20.63 | 13.45 | 35.64 | 31.28 |
| 20 | Wanting Cao (曹宛婷) | 14.55 | 29.12 | 25.12 | 38.97 | 14.55 | DNF | 23.28 |
| 21 | Boying Li (李博莹) | 11.41 | — | DNF | DNF | 11.41 | 11.45 | 16.20 |
Placement, best single and official average with every attempt in order. Best and worst counting solves are marked. DNF and DNS are never treated as times.