Competition Analysis for Solving in Sale 2021: Choose a Report to View Below

#	Competitor	Best	Average	1	2	3	4	5
1	Jonathan Charlesworth	49.13	53.87	54.09	51.07	56.46	1:01.34	49.13
2	Andy Gong	57.54	1:02.19	1:00.49	1:07.68	1:13.13	57.54	58.40
3	Darcy Way	56.86	1:04.34	1:06.13	1:11.68	1:00.57	56.86	1:06.33
4	David Epstein	1:02.16	1:06.55	1:02.16	1:03.96	1:11.89	1:03.81	1:28.21
5	Oscar Watson	1:06.05	1:08.61	1:08.23	1:14.75	1:07.83	1:09.77	1:06.05
6	Riley Dexter	1:04.18	1:09.86	DNF	1:17.07	1:04.18	1:05.50	1:07.01
7	Sebastian Outh-Aut	1:14.49	1:25.11	1:27.78	1:28.65	1:18.91	1:14.49	1:29.61
8	Myles Jarman	1:12.33	1:27.21	1:26.00	1:22.38	1:51.50	1:33.24	1:12.33
9	Junqi Feng (冯骏骐)	1:27.36	1:28.16	1:27.36	1:28.38	1:28.37	1:28.04	1:28.06
10	Ethan Pride	1:18.38	1:28.99	1:34.84	1:21.82	1:34.98	1:30.31	1:18.38
11	Phoenix Patterson	1:26.73	1:29.65	1:26.73	1:29.75	1:30.05	1:29.16	1:31.09
12	Ting Sheng Bao Yang	1:28.88	1:33.62	1:34.52	1:32.21	1:28.88	1:34.14	1:58.11
13	Dylan Beetge	1:28.75	1:37.18	1:28.75	1:31.99	1:46.00	1:40.55	1:39.00
14	Aaron Spiller	1:37.38	1:48.17	1:50.15	1:52.12	1:50.44	1:37.38	1:43.92
15	Zack Hall	1:45.64	1:59.71	2:12.51	1:53.64	1:45.64	2:13.96	1:52.97
16	Juno Niewand	1:58.31	2:08.80	2:27.17	1:58.31	1:58.45	2:01.11	2:26.84
17	Wonbao Kua	2:00.59	2:12.86	2:26.02	2:00.59	2:20.61	2:08.84	2:09.12
18	Joe Labas	2:01.76	2:26.99	2:28.72	2:01.76	2:24.20	2:28.06	2:40.37
19	Wesley Allen	2:30.58	—	2:34.78	2:30.58	—	—	—
20	Horace Yin	2:34.81	—	2:39.60	2:34.81	—	—	—
21	Patrick Kleverlaan	2:43.63	—	3:13.31	2:43.63	—	—	—
22	David Edwards	2:45.03	—	2:45.03	3:11.87	—	—	—
23	Alexander Chieng	3:09.60	—	DNF	3:09.60	—	—	—
24	Josiah Levchenko	3:29.03	—	3:29.03	DNF	—	—	—
25	Nicholas Eppingstall	3:30.73	—	3:40.02	3:30.73	—	—	—

Placement, best single and official average with every attempt in order. Best and worst counting solves are marked. DNF and DNS are never treated as times.