Competition Analysis for Rubik's Cube Sorocaba 2016: Choose a Report to View Below

#	Competitor	Best	Average	1	2	3	4	5
1	Iuri Grangeiro Carvalho	16.16	17.34	17.34	17.39	16.16	17.85	17.29
2	Diego Boasso Vera	17.87	20.16	21.13	21.13	17.87	19.62	19.72
3	Henry Hideki Goya	18.09	22.24	19.57	25.03	22.74	24.40	18.09
4	Lucas Ichiro Yunomae	21.03	23.13	24.01	23.26	24.00	22.13	21.03
5	Caio Hideaki Sato	20.00	23.85	28.44	29.64	20.00	22.88	20.22
6	Enzo Mattos	18.98	24.04	21.24	27.97	22.92	18.98	30.15
7	Adriano Matoba Lipski	19.33	24.90	31.99	23.32	25.35	19.33	26.02
8	Bernardo Zakur Corrêa Santos	22.59	26.53	28.46	29.23	28.43	22.59	22.70
9	Vicenzo Guerino Cecchini	20.75	30.21	36.51	28.54	35.29	20.75	26.81
10	Jorge Augusto Siqueira Pinto	31.91	32.77	34.38	31.98	32.01	34.33	31.91
11	Augusto Rosa Esteves	32.97	35.66	32.97	44.61	37.78	33.88	35.32
12	Henrique Yudi Kitamura	31.70	35.73	33.19	31.70	37.36	36.64	44.08
13	Gabriel Pitali de Carvalho	29.81	36.71	34.04	37.10	39.00	29.81	48.47
14	Giovane Rubin Fioravanti	35.78	39.25	40.32	40.47	35.78	36.96	42.55
15	Mateus Garcia Rodolfo	35.29	40.13	40.32	35.29	41.97	48.77	38.09
16	Vinicius Raphael Maximo dos Santos	38.33	42.04	38.33	40.85	40.72	46.11	44.56
17	João Vitor Teixeira de Almeida	38.88	44.05	38.88	46.57	49.71	41.58	44.01
18	Felipe Baldívio Freires	39.02	46.28	1:08.99	47.50	46.95	39.02	44.39
19	Ronan Felipe Jorge	26.93	49.85	1:02.40	59.99	26.93	38.11	51.44
20	Guilherme Tavano	53.26	1:00.92	57.12	1:04.20	1:01.43	53.26	1:19.63
21	Gilberto Caracciolo Morelli	58.09	1:04.64	58.09	1:12.74	58.34	1:08.52	1:07.05
22	Yan Espindola da Costa Jorge	53.47	1:08.86	53.47	DNF	59.08	1:11.42	1:16.08
23	Luis Henrique Pereira Tavares	1:08.18	1:16.86	1:20.88	DNF	1:11.60	1:18.10	1:08.18
24	Gustavo Canto Schaeffer	1:04.77	1:24.37	1:26.19	1:19.73	1:04.77	1:45.30	1:27.18
25	Roger Ramirez	1:02.06	1:25.09	1:02.06	1:17.76	1:40.61	DNF	1:16.90
26	Daniel Lehwing	1:32.46	—	DNF	1:32.46	—	—	—
27	Matheus Ferreira Gomes dos Santos	2:12.66	—	DNF	2:12.66	—	—	—

Placement, best single and official average with every attempt in order. Best and worst counting solves are marked. DNF and DNS are never treated as times.