Competition Analysis for Poly Cubed 2016: Choose a Report to View Below

#	Competitor	Best	Average	1	2	3	4	5
1	Max Park	29.77	31.35	31.25	32.17	30.62	29.77	37.05
2	Nathan Soria	35.05	35.79	41.09	35.05	35.48	36.19	35.71
3	Shane Grogan	32.78	36.98	38.31	40.84	35.37	37.27	32.78
4	Isaac Langer	36.98	41.66	42.50	39.58	42.91	36.98	45.56
5	Samuel Chiu	40.48	44.50	40.48	46.41	45.73	41.37	49.13
6	Danny SungIn Park	39.41	47.05	51.31	45.48	39.41	49.31	46.36
7	Jungwoo Kim (김정우)	45.45	50.37	51.96	50.82	55.10	48.34	45.45
8	Peter Chau	43.71	53.01	50.61	43.71	1:01.94	52.69	55.74
9	Eric Lee	54.89	1:00.09	1:06.29	58.67	54.89	1:06.63	55.30
10	Andrew Nathenson	57.32	1:00.91	57.32	1:02.83	1:00.62	1:14.84	59.27
11	Sean Saito	58.91	1:01.42	1:13.94	1:04.61	58.91	59.72	59.94
12	Kevin Lee	56.83	1:01.97	59.67	1:03.88	56.83	1:17.54	1:02.35
13	Jonathan Sun	1:07.60	1:11.16	1:11.52	1:07.60	1:23.56	1:13.16	1:08.79
14	Joshua Kim	1:03.05	1:16.05	1:18.17	1:11.96	1:20.25	1:18.01	1:03.05
15	Matthew Harris	1:11.05	1:24.91	1:30.32	1:11.05	1:28.75	1:25.67	1:20.31
16	Tina Xiangyan Jin (金香延)	1:16.17	—	1:31.48	1:16.17	—	—	—
17	Lucas Peters	1:21.97	—	1:24.57	1:21.97	—	—	—
18	Elijah Brown	1:23.33	—	1:30.74	1:23.33	—	—	—
19	Will Hamilton	1:24.20	—	1:24.20	1:26.36	—	—	—
20	Steven Turner	1:26.95	—	1:36.80	1:26.95	—	—	—
21	Lance Taningco	1:44.01	—	1:44.01	1:48.44	—	—	—
22	Haokun Wang (王皓琨)	1:50.79	—	1:50.79	2:22.07	—	—	—
23	Caeden Harrison	1:52.16	—	1:52.16	DNF	—	—	—
24	Vincent Giza	1:52.23	—	1:52.23	1:56.85	—	—	—
25	Chris Martin	1:53.99	—	1:54.99	1:53.99	—	—	—
26	Etheric Lujan	2:11.72	—	2:27.48	2:11.72	—	—	—
27	Louis Patterson	DNF	—	DNF	DNF	—	—	—

Placement, best single and official average with every attempt in order. Best and worst counting solves are marked. DNF and DNS are never treated as times.