Competition Analysis for Plum Puzzles 2024: Choose a Report to View Below

#	Competitor	Best	Average	1	2	3	4	5
1	AJ Kamal	37.56	39.27	37.56	38.45	39.93	43.50	39.43
2	Sean Cutshaw	52.24	55.97	54.46	56.94	59.09	52.24	56.51
3	Chris Chi	58.27	1:01.45	1:01.28	58.27	1:02.07	1:03.39	1:01.01
4	Gabriel Gowman	1:00.11	1:03.30	1:00.15	1:07.48	1:11.74	1:00.11	1:02.27
5	Caleb Kearney	54.82	1:04.49	1:10.08	1:01.11	1:07.11	54.82	1:05.24
6	Stephen Griggs	56.86	1:05.72	1:05.31	56.86	1:02.42	1:09.44	1:12.68
7	Xavier Ye	1:05.07	1:09.67	1:19.64	1:11.36	1:06.36	1:05.07	1:11.28
8	Mark Gowman	1:10.33	1:15.50	1:12.90	1:15.66	1:10.33	1:22.25	1:17.93
9	Tomas Kaiser	1:11.06	1:16.55	1:27.54	1:11.06	1:19.02	1:17.49	1:13.13
10	Dev Choksi	1:13.75	1:22.70	1:38.50	1:13.75	1:17.33	1:30.37	1:20.39
11	Jacob Nobili	1:17.04	1:23.59	1:18.94	1:17.04	1:27.92	1:28.33	1:23.90
12	Jacob Tucker	1:22.85	1:30.57	1:41.78	1:22.85	1:28.79	1:26.33	1:36.60
13	Krishna Joyce	1:19.67	1:45.15	1:19.67	1:35.95	1:50.24	1:49.26	1:54.92
14	Leland Pak	1:38.40	1:47.88	1:59.02	1:38.40	1:48.79	1:45.97	1:48.88
15	Dylan Kuriger	1:37.18	1:59.42	1:37.18	1:51.50	1:54.43	2:12.32	DNS
16	Samuel Pottinger	1:48.77	—	1:48.77	1:49.31	—	—	—
17	Zachary Garber	1:58.60	—	1:58.60	2:24.15	—	—	—
18	Owen Graham	2:20.56	—	2:30.68	2:20.56	—	—	—
19	Nathan Garland	2:23.86	—	2:33.99	2:23.86	—	—	—
20	David Wagner	2:26.68	—	2:35.71	2:26.68	—	—	—
21	Harrison Snyder	2:29.63	—	2:36.70	2:29.63	—	—	—
22	Nicholas Paff	2:30.63	—	DNF	2:30.63	—	—	—
23	Oliver Hettrich	2:34.36	—	3:29.04	2:34.36	—	—	—
24	Mason Paice	2:40.49	—	2:40.49	2:44.14	—	—	—
25	Edmund Barlow	2:45.62	—	3:13.32	2:45.62	—	—	—
26	Niam Choksi	3:01.81	—	3:01.93	3:01.81	—	—	—
27	Alex Herron	3:29.83	—	3:29.83	DNF	—	—	—
28	Asher Bowen McDaniel	3:29.87	—	DNF	3:29.87	—	—	—

Placement, best single and official average with every attempt in order. Best and worst counting solves are marked. DNF and DNS are never treated as times.