
Competition Analysis for Pittsburgh Winter 2025: Choose a Report to View Below
Controls for this report
Official standings exactly as the WCA recorded them.
Results — Skewb, Final
12 competitors
| # | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2.55 | 2.84 | 2.79 | 2.55 | 2.63 | 3.14 | 3.11 | |
| 2 | 1.45 | 3.14 | 3.07 | 2.64 | 3.71 | 1.45 | 4.83 | |
| 3 | 1.56 | 3.50 | 3.80 | 3.07 | 3.62 | 1.56 | 3.90 | |
| 4 | 1.46 | 3.97 | 3.28 | 4.35 | 5.45 | 1.46 | 4.29 | |
| 5 | 1.44 | 4.09 | 6.10 | 5.00 | 3.42 | 1.44 | 3.84 | |
| 6 | 1.81 | 4.59 | 4.69 | 4.23 | 4.85 | 1.81 | 6.88 | |
| 7 | 1.30 | 5.06 | 6.55 | 4.61 | 5.72 | 1.30 | 4.86 | |
| 8 | 4.02 | 6.00 | 5.30 | 5.39 | 7.32 | DNF | 4.02 | |
| 9 | 2.13 | 6.33 | 5.37 | 8.56 | 7.04 | 2.13 | 6.58 | |
| 10 | 4.38 | 6.72 | 9.01 | 4.92 | 6.23 | DNF | 4.38 | |
| 11 | 3.78 | 7.20 | 9.67 | 5.47 | 6.46 | DNF | 3.78 | |
| 12 | 4.36 | — | 4.36 | 5.56 | 5.27 | DNF | DNF |
Placement, best single and official average with every attempt in order. Best and worst counting solves are marked. DNF and DNS are never treated as times.