Speedcubing.appSC.app

Peach State 2019

Sign in to follow

Results

May 25, 2019 – May 26, 2019Day 1: [Chattahoochee Technical College (Paulding Campus)](http://www.chattahoocheetech.edu/), Day 2: [Paulding County Senior Center](https://www.paulding.gov/203/Senior-Center) · Dallas, Georgia, US100 people11 events

6x6x6 Cube

Analyze 6x6x6 Cube

First round

#	Competitor	Best	Average	Solves
1	Sean Hartman	1:52.25	1:58.75	1:59.07 1:52.25 2:04.94 — —
2	Katie Hull	1:59.66	2:01.73	1:59.66 2:01.79 2:03.75 — —
3	Jared Stinson	1:56.92	2:05.38	2:18.87 2:00.35 1:56.92 — —
4	Raymond Goslow	2:12.89	2:23.31	2:12.89 2:28.87 2:28.17 — —
5	Jacob Ambrose	2:29.40	2:35.78	2:43.68 2:34.27 2:29.40 — —
6	Ivan Krueger	2:49.67	2:54.02	2:53.88 2:49.67 2:58.51 — —
7	Daniel Mullen	2:43.66	2:55.47	2:43.66 3:04.90 2:57.85 — —
8	Jacob Keener	2:48.70	3:04.79	3:15.53 2:48.70 3:10.15 — —
9	Patrick French	3:23.13	3:28.67	3:38.42 3:23.13 3:24.45 — —
10	Christopher Cabrera	3:27.94	3:33.99	3:43.66 3:30.38 3:27.94 — —
11	Nate Hunter	3:26.47	3:35.55	3:48.00 3:32.18 3:26.47 — —
12	Ian Markley	3:43.15	3:49.00	3:43.15 3:45.04 3:58.80 — —
13	Clay Moore	3:43.76	3:59.38	3:43.76 3:44.91 4:29.47 — —
14	Vishwa Sankar	4:32.26	4:49.96	4:32.26 5:11.33 4:46.28 — —
15	Noah Crisp	4:33.67	5:08.89	5:42.77 4:33.67 5:10.24 — —
16	Ray Toma	5:21.54	6:01.03	7:14.44 5:21.54 5:27.12 — —
17	Cari Goslow	5:35.82	6:29.14	7:02.06 6:49.55 5:35.82 — —
18	Cady Shields	8:06.29	8:44.77	8:26.54 8:06.29 9:41.49 — —

Second round

#	Competitor	Best	Average	Solves
1	Sean Hartman	1:44.91	1:48.71	1:50.69 1:50.54 1:44.91 — —
2	Jared Stinson	1:53.29	1:58.41	2:07.48 1:53.29 1:54.47 — —
3	Katie Hull	1:48.85	2:01.18	2:08.81 1:48.85 2:05.89 — —
4	Raymond Goslow	2:21.72	2:26.42	2:28.58 2:21.72 2:28.95 — —
5	Jacob Ambrose	2:18.74	2:33.51	3:01.31 2:20.48 2:18.74 — —
6	Daniel Mullen	2:35.16	2:39.79	2:42.46 2:41.74 2:35.16 — —
7	Jacob Keener	2:42.08	2:46.97	2:47.64 2:51.20 2:42.08 — —
8	Ivan Krueger	2:36.75	2:48.57	3:06.59 2:42.37 2:36.75 — —
9	Clay Moore	3:19.52	3:34.19	3:43.55 3:39.50 3:19.52 — —
10	Christopher Cabrera	3:36.27	3:38.90	3:41.20 3:39.23 3:36.27 — —
11	Nate Hunter	3:35.02	3:44.80	3:35.02 3:50.16 3:49.21 — —
12	Ian Markley	3:39.95	4:24.31	3:39.95 4:45.67 4:47.32 — —

Final

#	Competitor	Best	Average	Solves
1	Sean Hartman	1:45.34	1:51.78	1:54.56 1:55.43 1:45.34 — —
2	Jared Stinson	1:44.85	1:57.62	1:44.85 2:00.92 2:07.10 — —
3	Katie Hull	2:00.54	2:02.53	2:00.54 2:03.34 2:03.72 — —
4	Raymond Goslow	2:13.94	2:18.28	2:23.70 2:13.94 2:17.20 — —
5	Jacob Ambrose	2:20.45	2:31.01	2:43.31 2:20.45 2:29.26 — —
6	Jacob Keener	2:39.51	2:44.53	2:45.50 2:39.51 2:48.59 — —
7	Daniel Mullen	2:33.78	2:45.08	2:50.53 2:33.78 2:50.94 — —
8	Ivan Krueger	2:32.56	2:51.20	2:49.77 2:32.56 3:11.26 — —
9	Clay Moore	3:20.01	3:26.08	3:26.21 3:32.02 3:20.01 — —