Competition Analysis for Lucia Open 2016: Choose a Report to View Below

#	Competitor	Best	Average	1	2	3	4	5
1	Simon Westlund	30.76	34.05	33.02	34.95	30.76	34.17	40.35
2	Daniel Wallin	34.14	38.05	34.14	34.44	38.12	41.95	41.59
3	Martin Vædele Egdal	36.05	38.80	39.33	36.05	39.26	42.77	37.80
4	Nathaniel Berg	37.10	41.18	39.67	37.10	43.89	39.97	45.39
5	Jakob Gunnarsson	38.35	43.74	43.71	38.35	42.76	48.88	44.74
6	Daniel Vædele Egdal	41.64	44.87	42.60	44.75	41.64	47.87	47.25
7	Rasmus Andersson	37.12	47.25	42.83	58.04	51.24	37.12	47.67
8	Viktor Ejlertsson	46.98	47.77	46.98	47.03	47.26	58.75	49.01
9	Anders Berggren	42.21	50.55	1:01.14	42.21	44.10	52.13	55.41
10	Toni Beljo	50.56	54.95	55.04	58.99	50.56	52.01	57.79
11	Hampus Hellqvist	53.59	59.05	1:02.89	54.55	53.59	59.72	1:06.75
12	Jesper Nilsson	53.48	59.93	53.48	1:08.90	56.40	1:05.12	58.27
13	Måns Tangvald	54.74	1:01.58	54.74	1:02.39	1:06.25	1:01.14	1:01.21
14	Elias Strid	55.23	1:03.22	55.23	59.17	1:06.52	1:16.95	1:03.97
15	Johan Thuvesen	52.72	1:05.78	DNF	1:13.31	59.17	1:04.85	52.72
16	Thomas Mæhle Schmidt	1:02.42	1:07.01	1:05.47	1:04.88	1:02.42	1:10.68	1:26.52
17	Helmer Ewert	54.84	1:07.95	1:13.11	1:22.15	58.02	54.84	1:12.73
18	Alfred Frändberg	56.32	1:10.74	1:03.53	56.32	1:12.90	DNF	1:15.78
19	Lovisa Eriksson	1:03.95	1:12.84	1:12.46	1:10.12	1:15.93	1:19.13	1:03.95
20	Elvin Thorsen	55.49	1:18.90	1:20.71	1:16.15	55.49	1:26.47	1:19.83
21	Ludvig Sandh	1:10.36	1:23.61	1:24.32	1:10.36	1:22.72	1:26.59	1:23.80
22	Jonathan Östberg	1:18.42	1:24.15	1:18.42	1:40.58	1:28.11	1:22.47	1:21.88
23	Adam Hama Gareb	1:21.21	—	1:22.33	1:21.21	—	—	—
24	Axel Östling	1:26.74	—	DNF	1:26.74	—	—	—
25	Alvin Robertsson	1:35.20	—	1:45.93	1:35.20	—	—	—
26	William Jensen	1:56.88	—	1:56.88	2:15.98	—	—	—
27	Simon Jansson	2:09.25	—	2:09.25	2:46.98	—	—	—
28	Leo Blyberg	2:13.76	—	2:13.76	2:41.90	—	—	—
29	Rickard Hjerpe	2:15.07	—	2:15.07	2:23.41	—	—	—
30	Axel Flordal	2:39.61	—	2:39.61	DNF	—	—	—
31	Valdemar Bengtsson	2:42.76	—	2:57.36	2:42.76	—	—	—

Placement, best single and official average with every attempt in order. Best and worst counting solves are marked. DNF and DNS are never treated as times.