LLS VII Final 2018

Results

September 15, 2018 – September 16, 2018[I Liceum Ogólnokształcące im. Stanisława Staszica w Lublinie](http://lo01.pl/staszic/) · Lublin, PL49 people13 events

All results

Pyraminx

Analyze Pyraminx

Second round

#	Competitor	Best	Average	Solves
1	Rafał Waryszak	1.90	2.70	3.36 1.90 2.51 2.57 3.03
2	Michał Mlostek	2.65	3.52	5.02 3.64 2.65 3.33 3.59
3	Magdalena Pabisz	3.41	3.61	3.92 3.41 3.66 3.55 3.62
4	Piotr Tokarski	2.48	3.69	4.92 4.69 3.61 2.48 2.78
5	Aleksander Arefiew	3.02	3.77	4.36 3.59 3.02 3.35 5.33
6	Wojciech Weremczuk	3.03	4.32	3.92 4.77 6.71 3.03 4.26
7	Mateusz Kotwica	2.33	4.53	20.36 3.66 5.52 2.33 4.41
8	Mateusz Gil	3.58	4.54	5.62 4.35 5.98 3.58 3.64
9	Przemysław Rogalski	2.41	4.68	6.97 3.88 2.41 3.18 7.32
10	Grzegorz Szumigaj	3.97	5.04	5.57 10.66 3.97 3.98 5.58
11	Jan Zych	3.81	5.53	7.02 5.95 5.17 3.81 5.47
12	Michał Krasowski	4.60	6.12	8.16 6.89 4.60 6.87 4.60
13	Szymon Potocki	5.52	6.28	6.45 6.02 5.52 7.07 6.37
14	Daniel Chudecki	5.61	6.37	6.66 7.03 6.08 5.61 6.37
15	Krystian Załuski	5.33	6.41	6.54 5.80 10.58 6.89 5.33
16	Kacper Szeląg	4.54	6.58	7.37 5.06 4.54 8.82 7.31
17	Mikołaj Tyra	5.15	6.83	8.88 6.60 6.94 5.15 6.94
18	Jakub Tkaczyk	6.45	7.16	7.26 7.20 7.02 6.45 9.94
19	Antoni Rumowski	3.72	7.47	8.69 6.46 7.27 DNF 3.72

First round

#	Competitor	Best	Average	Solves
1	Rafał Waryszak	2.61	3.56	2.88 4.11 3.70 4.70 2.61
2	Piotr Tokarski	2.79	3.60	2.79 2.97 3.99 4.31 3.84
3	Przemysław Rogalski	3.22	3.72	3.81 3.22 4.09 3.25 5.32
4	Magdalena Pabisz	3.11	3.80	3.37 3.11 4.37 5.35 3.65
5	Michał Mlostek	3.30	3.91	4.11 3.30 4.22 3.39 4.97
6	Wojciech Weremczuk	3.37	3.94	3.67 4.32 3.82 3.37 6.25
7	Michał Krasowski	3.21	4.05	3.88 11.31 4.00 3.21 4.28
8	Mateusz Kotwica	2.91	4.23	3.67 2.91 6.42 3.12 5.90
9	Jan Zych	4.24	5.24	4.24 5.16 4.44 6.13 6.37
10	Szymon Potocki	4.52	5.24	4.52 5.29 4.85 5.59 6.18
11	Mateusz Gil	2.54	5.37	8.60 2.54 2.89 DNF 4.62
12	Grzegorz Szumigaj	4.86	5.70	4.86 5.05 6.26 5.80 7.04
13	Aleksander Arefiew	4.29	5.73	6.42 6.07 4.69 6.66 4.29
14	Kacper Szeląg	4.05	6.02	7.59 7.39 4.41 4.05 6.27
15	Antoni Rumowski	4.23	6.41	DNF 7.72 6.66 4.23 4.86
16	Daniel Chudecki	5.42	6.65	5.72 8.65 6.83 5.42 7.39
17	Krystian Załuski	4.68	6.71	6.29 7.45 7.73 4.68 6.40
18	Mikołaj Tyra	4.72	6.76	5.84 7.79 8.62 6.64 4.72
19	Jakub Tkaczyk	5.41	7.06	6.47 5.99 8.71 5.41 9.22
20	Konrad Leśniak	6.55	7.21	6.55 6.59 7.28 8.47 7.77
21	Nikodem Tomaszuk	7.28	7.69	7.85 7.28 7.89 7.34 8.75
22	Patryk Skrzyński	6.98	8.32	7.68 10.71 6.98 9.69 7.60
23	Wiktoria Waryszak	7.20	9.21	9.37 9.45 9.01 9.24 7.20
24	Radosław Drozdowicz	8.22	9.69	8.67 10.93 9.60 10.81 8.22
25	Grzegorz Łuczyna	5.67	9.87	10.64 5.67 18.13 9.57 9.41
26	Mateusz Staniszewski	7.61	11.19	15.20 7.61 12.92 11.60 9.05
27	Dominik Dudzisz	9.60	13.85	9.60 10.99 17.18 15.04 15.52
28	Patryk Stachyra	10.79	—	12.72 10.79 — — —
29	Przemysław Kruczek	11.41	—	19.00 11.41 — — —
30	Arkadiusz Abramowski	11.42	—	11.42 13.67 — — —
31	Wojciech Papliński	12.13	—	12.13 12.24 — — —
32	Jakub Brzeziński	12.21	—	12.21 14.32 — — —
33	Damian Matraszek	12.22	—	12.22 20.44 — — —
34	Aleksander Siwek	12.97	—	12.97 15.73 — — —
35	Jakub Mazurek	13.15	—	13.15 19.49 — — —
36	Jakub Naja	14.13	—	14.13 16.03 — — —
37	Tomasz Waryszak	17.76	—	17.76 40.00 — — —
38	Kajetan Rychel	22.08	—	22.73 22.08 — — —
39	Hubert Kędra	22.19	—	22.19 31.63 — — —

Final

#	Competitor	Best	Average	Solves
1	Rafał Waryszak	2.90	3.29	3.48 3.81 3.12 2.90 3.28
2	Magdalena Pabisz	3.11	3.58	3.51 3.33 3.11 3.94 3.91
3	Michał Mlostek	3.53	3.82	3.57 4.21 3.53 3.69 7.22
4	Piotr Tokarski	2.94	4.32	2.94 4.81 3.58 4.58 4.84
5	Aleksander Arefiew	2.58	4.54	3.49 4.95 2.58 5.18 5.28
6	Wojciech Weremczuk	3.36	4.75	3.41 6.24 3.36 5.10 5.73
7	Mateusz Kotwica	4.19	5.48	18.73 5.58 4.92 5.93 4.19
8	Mateusz Gil	4.20	6.98	6.48 6.65 7.81 10.11 4.20