Competition Analysis for KMG Spring 2019: Choose a Report to View Below

#	Competitor	Best	Average	1	2	3	4	5
1	Oscar Roth Andersen	43.38	45.10	46.53	43.93	44.83	43.38	47.01
2	Martin Vædele Egdal	48.04	52.43	58.99	48.65	48.04	54.91	53.73
3	Daniel Vædele Egdal	53.82	57.85	59.25	53.82	1:08.35	59.10	55.19
4	Magnus Søndergaard Byrne	1:02.13	1:08.37	1:12.75	1:08.38	1:16.42	1:03.99	1:02.13
5	Rasmus Stub Detlefsen	1:03.91	1:11.42	1:03.91	1:09.35	1:20.94	1:03.97	1:20.97
6	Callum James Goodyear	1:07.07	1:11.77	1:10.12	1:11.66	1:07.07	1:13.52	1:14.16
7	Magnus Patrick Kanstrup	1:13.37	1:17.62	1:16.60	1:13.37	1:19.27	1:20.65	1:17.00
8	Zoé de Moffarts	1:05.14	1:18.31	1:22.01	1:11.64	1:24.75	1:21.27	1:05.14
9	Joy Liou Liu (刘丽欧)	1:25.21	1:33.08	1:35.36	1:25.21	1:31.96	1:46.21	1:31.92
10	Mathias Søndergaard Byrne	1:25.89	1:40.61	1:40.89	1:25.89	1:47.61	1:33.34	DNF
11	Steffen Nielsen	1:46.23	2:00.67	2:24.13	1:46.23	2:04.39	2:07.20	1:50.42
12	Thomas Sonnenberg Jarner	1:58.57	2:06.17	2:07.13	1:58.57	2:10.17	2:01.22	2:55.07
13	Daniel Anker Hermansen	2:02.63	2:12.28	2:20.04	2:02.63	DNF	2:11.11	2:05.68
14	Noah Søkilde Damborg	2:07.57	—	2:37.72	2:07.57	—	—	—
15	Laurids Abelsen Holm	2:10.89	—	2:38.04	2:10.89	—	—	—
16	Ida Exner	2:19.94	—	2:19.94	2:31.44	—	—	—
17	Mads Philipsen	2:46.49	—	3:08.90	2:46.49	—	—	—
18	Mikela Elleby Jørgensen	3:21.65	—	4:16.06	3:21.65	—	—	—
19	Lucas Hansen	4:16.04	—	4:29.72	4:16.04	—	—	—

Placement, best single and official average with every attempt in order. Best and worst counting solves are marked. DNF and DNS are never treated as times.