Competition Analysis for İstanbul January 2025: Choose a Report to View Below

#	Competitor	Best	Average	1	2	3	4	5
1	Emir Yusuf Çiçekdemir	4.31	4.78	6.10	4.49	4.93	4.91	4.31
2	Cemre Ertürk	4.09	6.36	6.24	5.97	6.86	4.09	10.51
3	Ömer Çavuş	4.54	7.10	6.62	7.96	6.89	4.54	7.78
4	Ahmet İhsan Özkan	6.16	7.12	11.66	7.19	6.61	6.16	7.55
5	Timur Demirci	4.13	7.26	8.32	7.27	7.55	4.13	6.97
6	Efe Öztürk	6.72	7.54	6.85	13.24	6.89	6.72	8.87
7	Ömer Çetinkaya	6.02	8.94	10.01	8.64	6.02	8.16	15.58
8	Ahmet Berkalp Tarakçı	4.56	9.35	8.95	10.83	8.26	4.56	12.37
9	Sarp İlmen	7.99	9.73	8.51	9.20	14.27	11.48	7.99
10	Igor Kaigalov	8.46	9.81	8.58	10.29	23.15	10.57	8.46
11	Toprak Berva Yıldırım	7.34	10.20	10.13	11.76	7.34	8.71	16.09
12	Ahmet Sait Kapıcıoğlu	5.32	10.41	5.32	12.36	11.18	7.94	12.10
13	Asiya Islam	7.64	11.15	11.66	12.47	7.64	9.32	14.34
14	Ahmet Eymen Büyükkeskin	6.89	11.41	7.09	13.46	19.37	13.67	6.89
15	Muhammed Eren Yalçın	10.46	12.02	10.96	24.97	10.46	10.63	14.46
16	Yusuf İpekçi	11.12	12.46	12.50	11.12	15.63	13.60	11.29
17	Ömer Said Atalay	10.93	14.66	10.93	10.94	DNF	17.29	15.74
18	Eray Aram İlter	8.38	16.29	17.96	8.38	18.80	18.59	12.32
19	Kuzey Yilmaz	12.48	16.36	26.22	13.71	15.43	19.93	12.48
20	Güney Gündoğdu	11.58	19.97	25.47	18.87	20.95	20.10	11.58
21	Çağan Avşar	11.70	20.85	11.70	27.18	24.25	18.30	19.99
22	Ahmet Çınar Akşit	18.24	22.68	18.24	19.99	25.73	25.56	22.49
23	Efe Hasan Şentürk	19.12	22.70	30.15	22.57	19.12	23.22	22.30
24	Çınar Gökmen	22.08	25.73	22.08	24.30	27.60	27.17	25.71
25	Emiralp Ocak	20.08	27.39	29.92	32.48	21.38	20.08	30.86

Placement, best single and official average with every attempt in order. Best and worst counting solves are marked. DNF and DNS are never treated as times.