Competition Analysis for INUMP São Paulo 2026: Choose a Report to View Below

#	Competitor	Best	Average	1	2	3	4	5
1	Luiz Fernando Santos de Sousa	4.79	5.51	5.43	4.79	6.20	6.60	4.89
2	Caio Hideaki Sato	5.35	6.50	5.96	6.76	5.35	7.42	6.79
3	Renan da Cunha Santos	6.08	7.02	6.08	7.16	6.94	6.95	8.95
4	Tiago Akihiro Fujita	7.49	8.11	DNF	7.61	7.58	9.14	7.49
5	Gabriel Vasconcellos Zavrisko dos Santos	7.20	9.13	10.06	7.20	8.75	8.58	DNF
6	Diego Paulo de Sousa	8.74	9.24	9.84	9.07	8.82	DNF	8.74
7	Matheus Casassa	8.53	10.35	9.34	10.39	11.32	8.53	DNF
8	Guilherme Santana	8.87	10.45	8.87	22.63	10.41	11.77	9.18
9	Emílio de Oliveira Pitarello	9.78	11.53	12.12	9.78	9.93	12.77	12.55
10	Jefferson de Carvalho Andrade	10.72	11.62	11.18	10.72	12.84	DNF	10.83
11	Fabio Bini Graciose	10.34	11.97	10.34	11.61	10.81	13.50	15.17
12	Enzo Gonçalves Motta	11.72	12.85	21.64	12.62	12.80	11.72	13.13
13	Isabela da Ponte Nacif	9.42	13.22	10.08	9.42	18.67	DNF	10.90
14	Leonardo Carvalho Feitosa	14.48	19.09	17.14	20.54	14.48	19.59	DNF
15	Melissa da Ponte Nacif	14.83	19.20	18.88	21.11	14.83	20.48	18.24
16	Felipe Dutra Lisboa	11.79	20.90	25.08	22.11	11.79	DNF	15.51
17	Sávio Alves Cabelo Pereira	20.28	25.12	DNF	21.10	20.28	32.52	21.73
18	Gustavo Rocha dos Santos	22.36	29.99	23.90	28.29	22.36	37.78	41.37
19	Pedro Stuani Guimarães	27.14	42.08	27.55	30.48	1:08.21	DNF	27.14
20	Eduardo Senem Neves	11.10	—	DNF	12.77	DNF	14.15	11.10
21	Leonardo Oliveira Santos	22.11	—	22.37	DNF	DNF	22.11	32.43

Placement, best single and official average with every attempt in order. Best and worst counting solves are marked. DNF and DNS are never treated as times.