Competition Analysis for Harvard Fall 2013: Choose a Report to View Below

#	Competitor	Best	Average	1	2	3	4	5
1	Kevin Costello III	1:18.56	1:22.09	1:20.90	1:18.56	1:24.58	1:44.75	1:20.80
2	Rowe Hessler	1:16.50	1:35.52	DNF	1:16.50	1:26.96	1:44.72	1:34.88
3	Tim Wong	1:32.28	1:39.41	1:33.11	1:41.02	1:48.13	1:44.11	1:32.28
4	Sydney Weaver	1:34.00	1:40.86	1:43.05	1:40.19	1:42.86	1:34.00	1:39.53
5	James Donahue	1:27.27	1:42.03	1:27.27	1:50.80	1:41.88	1:36.88	1:47.33
6	Jonah Crosby	1:36.40	1:46.64	1:48.02	1:36.40	1:41.81	1:52.71	1:50.09
7	Noa Arthurs	1:39.50	1:49.43	1:39.50	1:47.03	1:59.93	1:45.19	1:56.06
8	Nick Rech	1:42.09	1:50.07	1:53.43	2:06.50	1:50.50	1:46.27	1:42.09
9	Tim Reynolds	1:44.96	1:50.21	1:52.97	1:45.56	1:54.15	1:44.96	1:52.11
10	Samantha Raskind	1:39.16	1:50.45	2:05.78	1:51.00	1:55.16	1:39.16	1:45.19
11	Clark Cheng	1:54.34	1:58.54	2:00.56	1:59.58	2:19.25	1:54.34	1:55.47
12	Kian Barry	1:56.71	2:00.87	1:57.78	2:11.09	1:59.90	2:04.94	1:56.71
13	Alese Devin	2:06.47	2:17.84	2:14.19	2:06.47	2:22.08	2:36.88	2:17.25
14	Jasmine Hazel Mackin	2:13.63	2:23.39	2:14.63	2:13.63	2:28.25	2:27.30	DNF
15	Howie Craig	2:27.36	—	2:33.88	2:27.36	—	—	—
16	Nick Fulham	2:29.36	—	2:29.36	2:33.97	—	—	—
17	Chad Thut	2:35.50	—	2:35.50	2:36.53	—	—	—
18	Jason Kim	2:36.86	—	2:59.06	2:36.86	—	—	—
19	Timothy Wang	2:44.78	—	2:45.47	2:44.78	—	—	—
20	Sam Schultz	2:46.53	—	2:46.53	2:50.08	—	—	—
21	Rob Stuart	3:06.72	—	3:06.72	3:29.55	—	—	—
22	Kyle Marshall	3:11.50	—	3:16.65	3:11.50	—	—	—
23	Aryan Kejriwal	3:16.03	—	3:16.03	3:56.69	—	—	—
24	Jason Bauer	3:19.69	—	3:21.44	3:19.69	—	—	—
25	Gus Lipkin	3:21.22	—	3:52.78	3:21.22	—	—	—
26	Colin Boyd	3:31.00	—	3:31.00	DNF	—	—	—
27	Ivan Duralde	3:44.02	—	3:44.02	3:56.96	—	—	—
28	Andrew MacGregor	3:45.90	—	DNF	3:45.90	—	—	—
29	Daniel Freymann	DNF	—	DNF	DNF	—	—	—
30	Joshua Carnes#29	DNF	—	DNF	DNF	—	—	—
31	Micael Boulet#29	DNF	—	DNF	DNF	—	—	—

Placement, best single and official average with every attempt in order. Best and worst counting solves are marked. DNF and DNS are never treated as times.