Competition Analysis for Dutch Spring 2022: Choose a Report to View Below

#	Competitor	Best	Average	1	2	3	4	5
1	Mattheo de Wit	1.81	2.34	2.60	1.81	2.32	2.11	3.00
2	Mika Smulders	1.81	2.35	3.09	1.81	5.83	2.05	1.91
3	Luuk van Gastel	2.98	3.51	2.98	2.98	5.05	3.27	4.29
4	Amiel Engel	2.95	3.56	3.84	3.43	3.46	3.79	2.95
5	Finn van der Maas	2.91	3.59	4.45	3.10	2.91	3.22	6.36
6	Tijmen van der Ree	2.48	3.60	3.87	2.87	2.48	4.26	4.05
7	Twan Dullemond	2.37	3.62	5.36	3.40	3.42	2.37	4.03
8	Daniël Kassab	2.28	3.65	4.11	2.28	3.18	3.87	3.89
9	David Kootstra	3.10	3.94	3.28	5.33	4.32	3.10	4.22
10	Ivo Stoutjesdijk	2.89	4.09	2.89	3.60	4.33	4.86	4.33
11	Robin Verstraten	3.76	4.19	4.17	4.32	3.76	4.08	5.52
12	Ole Meindersma	3.70	4.73	4.78	4.89	4.96	4.53	3.70
13	Tobias Hermans	3.70	5.08	6.03	5.94	4.07	3.70	5.24
14	Koen Roos	3.22	5.26	4.62	6.79	4.36	3.22	7.11
15	Jonathan Plug	3.17	5.43	7.08	3.17	5.24	4.93	6.12
16	Matthias Schegers	4.01	5.92	5.75	7.62	4.01	8.22	4.40

Placement, best single and official average with every attempt in order. Best and worst counting solves are marked. DNF and DNS are never treated as times.