Competition Analysis for Cubing Portal Sandnes 2023: Choose a Report to View Below

#	Competitor	Best	Average	1	2	3	4	5
1	Kim Roger Haraldsen	3.14	4.02	3.66	4.14	7.13	4.26	3.14
2	Simon Øgreid Ravnås	3.94	5.03	5.57	7.80	4.53	3.94	5.00
3	Kenneth Tran	4.54	5.85	4.54	6.61	4.95	6.84	5.99
4	Magne Njå	3.98	6.62	3.98	5.78	8.85	6.15	7.93
5	Isaiah Snow Beckingham	4.60	6.88	4.82	9.02	11.50	4.60	6.79
6	Olav Bergeland Sandven	5.63	7.86	5.63	8.60	6.89	DNF	8.10
7	Michael Jay Richards	4.99	8.02	4.99	9.52	8.26	6.28	12.39
8	Ulrik Bredland	6.83	8.02	6.98	8.84	8.24	6.83	13.05
9	Andreas Eriksen	6.87	9.05	6.87	8.43	8.29	10.43	16.17
10	Ethan Caumes	8.14	9.85	8.14	12.03	8.61	18.65	8.91
11	Kasper Korsnes	9.13	9.93	9.60	9.13	11.46	9.69	10.50
12	Herman Stensvoll Nordstrøm	7.85	10.07	9.90	14.10	9.08	7.85	11.23
13	Tobias Lied	9.86	10.60	16.07	9.86	10.71	10.68	10.40
14	Nina Galvani-Vonnet	8.85	10.63	10.98	13.94	8.85	10.47	10.45
15	Kristian Nybråten	9.73	11.87	15.93	10.33	12.32	9.73	12.96
16	Sondre Vassbø	9.29	11.98	13.48	10.76	14.59	11.69	9.29
17	Sarah Øgreid Ravnås	9.69	12.79	16.28	18.00	10.73	9.69	11.36
18	Adrian Helland Paulsen	10.50	12.94	10.50	17.52	14.41	11.31	13.10
19	Jonas Hansen Haugsvær	8.69	13.31	13.04	15.72	11.16	8.69	17.00
20	Adrian Holzmann	11.62	13.76	11.62	15.29	15.45	12.72	13.28
21	Oskar Holzmann	11.34	13.99	11.69	DNF	11.34	13.93	16.36
22	Jeremias Hinz	11.53	15.71	21.09	16.51	18.44	11.53	12.17
23	Jone Smørdal	11.74	15.88	14.42	17.79	11.74	32.38	15.43
24	Lukas Byrski	11.25	16.74	13.26	DNF	19.01	17.95	11.25

Placement, best single and official average with every attempt in order. Best and worst counting solves are marked. DNF and DNS are never treated as times.