Competition Analysis for Crevalcore al Cubo 2022: Choose a Report to View Below

#	Competitor	Best	Average	1	2	3	4	5
1	Marco Giordano	1.95	3.03	2.29	3.31	3.49	6.81	1.95
2	Elian Beguec	1.93	3.49	3.66	3.81	3.00	4.83	1.93
3	Sofia Saletnich	2.81	4.38	5.51	DNF	3.97	3.65	2.81
4	Paolo Marino	2.33	4.63	4.61	5.37	3.91	6.16	2.33
5	Alessandro Nicolì	3.65	4.88	3.65	5.04	5.16	4.44	7.07
6	Simone Marcellini	4.38	5.90	5.63	6.18	4.38	6.86	5.89
7	Marco Bufalini	3.44	6.14	6.65	8.65	3.98	7.78	3.44
8	Diego Catà	2.47	6.62	6.32	6.16	7.50	7.37	2.47
9	Marco Rota	5.72	7.38	6.92	5.72	9.00	9.23	6.23
10	Leonardo Brandolini	6.34	7.41	8.18	6.34	8.27	6.52	7.54
11	Alessia Novizio	6.43	8.08	7.39	10.27	6.43	11.24	6.57
12	Leonardo Baldo	5.96	8.72	5.96	11.31	7.34	10.24	8.57
13	Luca Brasini	7.33	8.76	10.42	7.62	7.33	10.96	8.24
14	Simone Cantarelli	6.47	8.77	12.68	9.23	6.75	6.47	10.33
15	Adam Scanabissi	6.62	9.29	6.62	9.79	9.43	8.64	10.27
16	Matteo Provasi	7.53	9.29	10.52	7.53	9.88	7.64	10.36
17	Anton Kokalj Pezzano	7.35	10.20	7.35	10.69	9.81	10.11	11.17
18	Leonardo Alvoid-Zanardi	10.02	10.84	12.59	10.02	11.25	10.83	10.44
19	Samuele Artale	9.53	11.48	9.53	12.03	9.65	12.75	15.19
20	Davide Arnesano	1.84	—	1.84	3.48	2.10	DNF	DNF

Placement, best single and official average with every attempt in order. Best and worst counting solves are marked. DNF and DNS are never treated as times.