Competition Analysis for Cincinnati Speed Solving 2024: Choose a Report to View Below

#	Competitor	Best	Average	1	2	3	4	5
1	Luke Van Laningham	1.14	1.69	1.85	3.03	1.22	1.14	2.00
2	Luke Garrett	1.06	1.73	5.28	1.60	1.64	1.06	1.95
3	Sujan Feist	1.19	2.09	3.21	1.64	1.19	3.29	1.42
4	Jacob Dyland Bennett	1.11	2.47	2.16	3.44	1.84	1.11	3.42
5	Luke Griesser	2.08	2.69	2.08	2.63	2.85	2.59	3.69
6	Keenan Darkins	2.72	3.36	3.52	2.72	2.87	5.03	3.69
7	Steven Wintringham	2.79	3.43	2.79	3.41	4.17	3.69	3.19
8	Oliver Hettrich	2.79	3.70	2.79	3.06	5.75	3.88	4.17
9	Nate Abeleda	2.92	3.71	4.07	4.04	2.92	3.65	3.45
10	Evan Brown	2.78	3.79	7.02	3.37	2.78	3.77	4.22
11	Cliford Samuel Pradeep Jelin	1.72	3.82	4.99	4.02	2.46	1.72	9.22
12	Collin Roberts	3.08	3.97	4.54	3.08	6.43	4.15	3.21
13	Harsha Paladugu	3.57	4.36	4.30	3.57	6.69	3.72	5.05
14	Dominic Brandi	3.27	4.45	5.37	3.27	5.21	4.82	3.33
15	Camden Morgan	3.12	4.63	3.12	5.43	3.95	4.52	6.09
16	Nolan Mathew Roode	4.37	5.39	4.37	6.13	5.13	7.26	4.92

Placement, best single and official average with every attempt in order. Best and worst counting solves are marked. DNF and DNS are never treated as times.