Competition Analysis for Cicero 2023: Choose a Report to View Below

#	Competitor	Best	Average	1	2	3
1	Evan Liu	1:41.51	1:47.02	1:42.40	1:41.51	1:57.15
2	Andrew Mao	2:02.02	2:09.31	2:16.81	2:02.02	2:09.09
3	Eli Ozsvath	2:10.40	2:17.16	2:26.33	2:14.74	2:10.40
4	Louis Truong	2:16.89	2:19.79	2:23.84	2:18.64	2:16.89
5	Noah Melita	2:11.74	2:31.17	2:47.58	2:34.20	2:11.74
6	Ernie Pulchny	2:31.82	2:36.85	2:31.82	2:40.79	2:37.93
7	Nico Ozsvath	2:40.51	2:44.43	2:40.51	2:44.92	2:47.86
8	Rex Ozsvath	2:52.45	2:56.74	2:57.84	2:59.92	2:52.45
9	Alex Cohen	2:41.18	3:09.59	2:41.18	3:42.77	3:04.82
10	Skylar Porter	3:14.46	3:23.56	3:31.63	3:14.46	3:24.59
11	Addy Coolidge	3:11.54	3:36.76	3:54.58	3:11.54	3:44.15
12	Edward Habeck IV	3:34.43	3:50.90	3:50.26	4:08.01	3:34.43
13	Nathan Smith	4:51.69	—	4:51.69	—	—
14	Brando Fusco	6:07.29	—	6:07.29	—	—

Placement, best single and official average with every attempt in order. Best and worst counting solves are marked. DNF and DNS are never treated as times.