
Competition Analysis for Binghamton Winter 2025: Choose a Report to View Below
Controls for this report
Official standings exactly as the WCA recorded them.
Results — Skewb, Final
11 competitors
| # | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 3.12 | 4.16 | 3.31 | 4.37 | 3.12 | 6.86 | 4.79 | |
| 2 | 3.61 | 5.26 | 6.38 | 3.97 | 3.61 | 6.04 | 5.76 | |
| 3 | 4.46 | 5.81 | 7.27 | DNF | 4.46 | 5.44 | 4.71 | |
| 4 | 4.52 | 7.44 | 7.99 | 13.68 | 7.35 | 4.52 | 6.99 | |
| 5 | 3.39 | 7.45 | 3.39 | 8.17 | 8.61 | DNF | 5.57 | |
| 6 | 7.65 | 8.32 | 8.88 | 8.64 | 7.85 | 7.65 | 8.48 | |
| 7 | 5.24 | 8.52 | 5.24 | 8.63 | 6.60 | DNF | 10.32 | |
| 8 | 5.29 | 8.84 | 16.49 | 7.96 | 10.82 | 5.29 | 7.75 | |
| 9 | 4.32 | 9.39 | 4.32 | DNF | 12.01 | 4.45 | 11.71 | |
| 10 | 7.70 | 10.44 | 10.34 | 12.38 | 7.70 | 13.25 | 8.59 | |
| 11 | 6.21 | 11.58 | 6.21 | 12.62 | 11.87 | 10.25 | 14.71 |
Placement, best single and official average with every attempt in order. Best and worst counting solves are marked. DNF and DNS are never treated as times.