Competition Analysis for BC Spring Solving B 2023: Choose a Report to View Below

#	Competitor	Best	Average	1	2	3	4	5
1	Luke Jankowiak	1:08.55	1:12.40	1:12.72	1:08.55	1:21.23	1:08.86	1:15.62
2	Noah Stelting	1:07.00	1:14.39	1:09.51	1:15.03	1:07.00	1:19.90	1:18.62
3	Kevin Matthews	1:09.56	1:14.88	1:14.09	1:26.30	1:14.64	1:15.91	1:09.56
4	Michele Cavezza	1:04.15	1:14.93	1:13.84	1:04.15	1:32.22	1:12.20	1:18.74
5	Ethan Rusnak	1:01.96	1:17.92	1:29.00	1:16.21	1:14.36	1:23.20	1:01.96
6	Allan Wang	1:09.56	1:20.79	1:17.83	1:09.56	1:21.35	1:30.09	1:23.19
7	Kyle Van Straaten	1:20.44	1:22.81	1:20.44	1:21.40	1:21.34	1:30.48	1:25.68
8	Kenny Zhong	1:20.90	1:26.48	1:32.83	1:24.11	1:22.51	DNF	1:20.90
9	Kyle Tam	1:27.40	1:36.82	1:27.40	1:38.48	1:47.73	1:30.94	1:41.04
10	Daniel Ahokas	1:27.86	1:38.06	1:27.86	1:45.70	1:36.96	1:41.89	1:35.34
11	Yuzhong Luo	1:36.37	1:41.52	1:43.19	1:36.37	1:36.69	1:46.05	1:44.69
12	Tyler Ly	1:35.27	1:47.06	1:45.03	1:47.46	1:59.04	1:35.27	1:48.69
13	Brian Huaxia Zhang	1:56.41	1:59.60	1:56.71	1:58.03	1:56.41	2:08.72	2:04.05
14	Alvin Wong	1:45.52	2:02.14	2:20.24	1:45.52	2:07.59	1:53.72	2:05.11
15	Shawn Yang	1:55.85	2:02.34	2:01.02	2:07.68	1:55.85	1:58.33	2:21.65
16	Nathan Siwen Wang (王思文)	2:02.68	2:12.21	2:02.68	2:13.43	2:14.06	2:12.55	2:10.65
17	Avery Post	2:15.64	2:34.64	2:40.98	2:15.64	2:28.08	2:43.32	2:34.85
18	Mostafa Mahran	2:28.34	—	2:38.58	2:28.34	2:30.27	DNF	DNS
19	Raymond Wang	2:37.32	—	2:37.32	2:41.82	—	—	—
20	David Ghabour	2:50.75	—	3:21.72	2:50.75	—	—	—
21	Ajoy Kaul	2:56.93	—	3:16.23	2:56.93	—	—	—
22	Tru Quoc Nguyen	2:59.35	—	3:32.85	2:59.35	—	—	—
23	Heewon Hwang	3:00.33	—	4:18.42	3:00.33	—	—	—
24	Zaylan Spalek	3:21.74	—	3:21.74	3:26.73	—	—	—
25	Cohen Janzen	3:33.54	—	3:33.54	3:58.88	—	—	—
26	Justin Taliman	3:50.70	—	3:54.69	3:50.70	—	—	—
27	Luke Zhang	4:53.38	—	5:00.01	4:53.38	—	—	—
28	Etan Huang	6:09.94	—	6:16.02	6:09.94	—	—	—

Placement, best single and official average with every attempt in order. Best and worst counting solves are marked. DNF and DNS are never treated as times.