Competition Analysis for BC Spring Solving A 2023: Choose a Report to View Below

#	Competitor	Best	Average	1	2	3	4	5
1	Max Siauw	45.89	49.57	50.72	1:02.29	45.89	50.47	47.53
2	Sameer Aggarwal	47.94	53.21	55.22	53.78	50.64	59.39	47.94
3	Jonathan Truchot	1:00.66	1:07.32	1:08.68	1:00.66	1:05.69	1:07.88	1:08.40
4	Jack Anderson	1:02.50	1:09.69	1:02.50	1:25.04	1:09.94	1:09.57	1:09.56
5	Joseph Goyder	1:21.11	1:23.39	1:24.35	1:23.48	1:21.11	1:30.35	1:22.34
6	Callen Kleij	1:13.73	1:25.17	1:13.73	1:40.20	1:30.28	1:18.01	1:27.22
7	Peter Barnwell	1:27.19	1:30.82	1:28.74	1:29.26	1:34.47	1:27.19	1:35.70
8	Vianne Chang	1:24.27	1:32.55	2:10.47	1:34.64	1:31.82	1:31.19	1:24.27
9	Matthew Ma	1:26.22	1:37.25	1:49.70	1:29.88	1:26.22	1:48.24	1:33.62
10	Jayce Li	1:22.09	1:39.77	1:41.71	1:22.09	1:38.12	1:46.52	1:39.49
11	Samuel Scherrer	1:34.18	1:43.14	2:00.33	1:47.31	1:35.82	1:34.18	1:46.30
12	Lawrence Li	1:39.48	1:46.50	1:46.20	1:39.48	1:47.81	1:46.55	1:46.76
13	Lukas Hörbach	1:33.15	1:46.69	1:44.04	1:46.18	2:11.63	1:49.86	1:33.15
14	Enoch Yee Rassachack	1:43.27	1:49.28	1:43.27	1:50.13	1:44.79	1:52.92	1:56.18
15	Soren Vigesaa	1:48.31	2:01.49	1:53.51	2:03.56	2:30.96	2:07.40	1:48.31
16	Taiyo Berčič	2:05.95	2:11.40	2:18.71	2:08.63	2:12.91	2:12.66	2:05.95
17	Anna Moughnie	1:52.27	2:13.53	2:17.86	2:09.12	2:13.62	2:18.21	1:52.27
18	Kevin Lê	2:02.96	2:16.81	2:06.44	2:02.96	2:19.35	2:24.65	DNF
19	Sohum Nigam	1:59.84	2:22.75	2:39.83	2:11.75	2:16.66	1:59.84	3:06.46
20	Rob Neufeld	2:48.26	—	2:48.26	2:58.38	—	—	—
21	Isaac Davies	3:07.89	—	3:09.52	3:07.89	—	—	—
22	Bobby Moon	3:39.85	—	3:41.75	3:39.85	—	—	—
23	Firas Qumsieh	3:46.05	—	4:07.27	3:46.05	—	—	—
24	Jannik Pichler	3:49.06	—	4:04.54	3:49.06	—	—	—
25	Garett Cox	4:14.35	—	4:19.52	4:14.35	—	—	—
26	Cheng Cheng	4:21.36	—	4:21.36	4:37.59	—	—	—
27	Viyaan Pawar	4:27.64	—	4:27.64	5:50.86	—	—	—

Placement, best single and official average with every attempt in order. Best and worst counting solves are marked. DNF and DNS are never treated as times.