
Competition Analysis for Algorithms in Antipolo III 2025: Choose a Report to View Below
Controls for this report
Official standings exactly as the WCA recorded them.
Results — Skewb, Final
11 competitors
| # | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0.99 | 2.82 | 2.65 | 0.99 | 3.09 | 2.72 | 3.51 | |
| 2 | 1.34 | 3.16 | 2.97 | 1.34 | 4.78 | 2.93 | 3.57 | |
| 3 | 1.21 | 3.35 | 3.84 | 1.21 | 2.92 | 3.30 | 5.29 | |
| 4 | 0.98 | 3.67 | 5.89 | 0.98 | 3.24 | 3.60 | 4.18 | |
| 5 | 1.28 | 4.24 | 4.63 | 1.28 | 3.48 | 5.91 | 4.62 | |
| 6 | 1.88 | 4.60 | 5.06 | 1.88 | 7.76 | 4.20 | 4.53 | |
| 7 | 1.76 | 7.35 | 7.82 | 1.76 | 9.66 | 5.81 | 8.41 | |
| 8 | 4.82 | 7.64 | 5.65 | 4.82 | 10.20 | DNF | 7.06 | |
| 9 | 2.35 | 8.65 | 10.67 | 2.35 | 9.07 | 11.15 | 6.20 | |
| 10 | 4.34 | 10.39 | 36.98 | 4.34 | 8.34 | 11.44 | 11.40 | |
| 11 | 8.94 | 13.46 | 13.66 | DNF | 14.38 | 8.94 | 12.33 |
Placement, best single and official average with every attempt in order. Best and worst counting solves are marked. DNF and DNS are never treated as times.